Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Horizontal wells have been widely used to significantly increase reservoir exposure in a wide range of conventional and unconventional oil and gas recovery applications, including tight-rock and multi-stage fracturing, offshore, primary and thermal heavy oil projects. In the heavy oil and bitumen reservoirs of the Western Canadian basin, horizontal wells have been extensively employed in Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) and Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) in-situ recovery projects. In SAGD applications, the lateral sections of these horizontal wells are generally completed with various types of sand control systems, including slotted liners, Wire Wrapped Screens (WWS) and premium screens with a growing percentage incorporating some form of downhole injection or production Flow Control Devices (FCD). Given the relatively shallow depths, low reservoir pressures and high fluid rates of these applications, these horizontal wells are often constructed with relatively high build rates and large diameter tubulars. In an effort to improve project economics, well designs with increasingly longer lateral sections are being pursued.In an effort to reduce potential damage during installation, engineering assessments are commonly conducted to ensure that the structural capacity of these liners exceeds the demand of the combined installation loads caused by liner-wellbore interaction and liner string buoyant weight, often with consideration of a suitable safety margin. To date, given the number of influential parameters, the complex nature of the analysis and corresponding computational demands, methods which employ significant simplifications, such as soft-string torque and drag (T&D) models, have been commonly used to assess liner installation loads. In addition, it appears that the current commercial soft-and stiff-string T&D analysis tools do not consider the nonlinear load capacity envelopes of the sand control liners in the evaluation to assess the potential damage under combined loading during installation. Advanced numerical methods, such as Finite Element Analysis (FEA), have also rarely been employed to evaluate the liner installation loads due to the complex nature of this problem. This paper presents an advanced stiff-string T&D analysis approach developed using the commercial FEA program Abaqus. To demonstrate the application of this approach, several example cases are presented simulating the installation of the slotted liner design into a horizontal SAGD well. In these T&D analyses, wellbore and tubulars were modeled using pipe elements which accurately capture various geometric parameters and associated mechanical responses of the tubulars. Contact interaction and the clearances between the tubulars and the wellbore were modeled. Different friction factor (FF) values were assigned to the cased and open hole sections of the well. By incorporating the load capacity envelopes of the specific slotted liner design into the analysis, this paper demonstrates how this methodology may be applied to assess the load ...
Horizontal wells have been widely used to significantly increase reservoir exposure in a wide range of conventional and unconventional oil and gas recovery applications, including tight-rock and multi-stage fracturing, offshore, primary and thermal heavy oil projects. In the heavy oil and bitumen reservoirs of the Western Canadian basin, horizontal wells have been extensively employed in Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) and Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) in-situ recovery projects. In SAGD applications, the lateral sections of these horizontal wells are generally completed with various types of sand control systems, including slotted liners, Wire Wrapped Screens (WWS) and premium screens with a growing percentage incorporating some form of downhole injection or production Flow Control Devices (FCD). Given the relatively shallow depths, low reservoir pressures and high fluid rates of these applications, these horizontal wells are often constructed with relatively high build rates and large diameter tubulars. In an effort to improve project economics, well designs with increasingly longer lateral sections are being pursued.In an effort to reduce potential damage during installation, engineering assessments are commonly conducted to ensure that the structural capacity of these liners exceeds the demand of the combined installation loads caused by liner-wellbore interaction and liner string buoyant weight, often with consideration of a suitable safety margin. To date, given the number of influential parameters, the complex nature of the analysis and corresponding computational demands, methods which employ significant simplifications, such as soft-string torque and drag (T&D) models, have been commonly used to assess liner installation loads. In addition, it appears that the current commercial soft-and stiff-string T&D analysis tools do not consider the nonlinear load capacity envelopes of the sand control liners in the evaluation to assess the potential damage under combined loading during installation. Advanced numerical methods, such as Finite Element Analysis (FEA), have also rarely been employed to evaluate the liner installation loads due to the complex nature of this problem. This paper presents an advanced stiff-string T&D analysis approach developed using the commercial FEA program Abaqus. To demonstrate the application of this approach, several example cases are presented simulating the installation of the slotted liner design into a horizontal SAGD well. In these T&D analyses, wellbore and tubulars were modeled using pipe elements which accurately capture various geometric parameters and associated mechanical responses of the tubulars. Contact interaction and the clearances between the tubulars and the wellbore were modeled. Different friction factor (FF) values were assigned to the cased and open hole sections of the well. By incorporating the load capacity envelopes of the specific slotted liner design into the analysis, this paper demonstrates how this methodology may be applied to assess the load ...
An inflow control device (ICD) incorporates either a restrictive or a tortuous flow path to impose an artificial pressure drop across the device. ICDs can offer a solution to the imbalance in heat transfer often seen along the wellbore and promote better conformance in steam chamber growth because they are able to re-distribute energy more evenly during steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) operations. ICDs can be applied in conventional and unconventional resources, but the main focus of this paper is unconventional applications, specifically bitumen production by SAGD. An outcome of efforts in 2008, the ICD’s first application was to mitigate flow conformance issues that were seen along the producer and injector wells; these issues were caused by various geologic and operational factors as well as backflow effects. The effectiveness of that first application has been well recognized in the form of higher bitumen production with better energy efficiency (Stalder, 2012). The conceived benefits of ICDs extend beyond production increases. One of the leading operators in the Athabasca oil deposits, who adopted ICDs in the early stage of their SAGD wells, confirmed ICD applications enabled them to produce bitumen even during the start-up circulation period and to realize a production increase of up to 80% at conversion to SAGD (Morgan, 2016). As more ICD success stories have circulated within the industry, SAGD operators’ interest in ICDs has grown steadily. On the basis of reviews of historical ICD performance, this paper provides lessons learned and suggested design improvements that will hopefully lead to more efficient ICD configurations in SAGD operations.
This paper investigates stress and strain distributions determined through finite-element analysis (FEA) simulation and three-dimensional (3-D), digital image correlation (DIC) measurements obtained during full-scale testing of a Technology Advancement of Multilaterals (TAML) Level 5 multilateral junction prototype subjected to high internal pressure. A multilateral well consists of one main wellbore with one or more lateral wellbores drilled from the main wellbore. The point at which a lateral is drilled from the main wellbore is identified as the wellbore junction. The wellbore junction's integrity is important to the success of the multilateral well construction (Samuel and Gao 2007). A TAML Level 5 junction is necessary to create pressure isolation across both lateral and mainbore legs to withstand high-pressure/high-temperature (HPHT) conditions in deeper oil and gas wells (TAML 2002). This study discusses a completion system TAML Level 5 multilateral junction subjected to a qualification program, including internal and external pressure cycles with the junction in a deployed position to verify pressure integrity. The junction was evaluated through both numerical simulation and full-scale physical testing of a prototype, which was designed to be run in 10-3/4-in., 65.7-lb casing with a 5-1/2-in. lateral leg and a 3-1/2-in. mainbore leg. This paper investigates stress and strain distributions determined through FEA simulation and 3-D DIC measurements obtained during full-scale testing of a junction at 6,000-psi internal pressure. Although DIC has been widely used for strain measurements within the industry, it was introduced into the junction-test program to meet increasingly challenging environments. Compared to conventional strain-gauge measurements, DIC allows for full-field strain measurements, including points at which complex geometries exist, such as the external intersection of the main and lateral legs, which is commonly the critical area with high stress concentrations. A correlation and comparison between the numerical simulation and DIC measurements are discussed to qualitatively validate the FEA model with experimental results. The petroleum industry requires more advanced technologies as wells are drilled in more challenging environments (i.e., deep sea, artic environments, higher pressures, etc.). To provide these advanced technologies, engineers need the capability to help ensure their designs meet the requirements of such challenging environments. DIC provides a means to qualitatively validate the numerical simulations for complex designs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.