2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sandbox fixed-mass algorithm for multifractal unweighted complex networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…87 Higher values of p r were shown to reduce the characteristic length scale in WS networks, which increases d f . 88 In the random limit (p r = 1), d f increases with the number of nodes, n. 89 Similarly, in this work, the fractal dimension, d f , of WS, LNP-R, and LP-R networks increases with larger p r as shown for LNP-R and LP-R networks in Figure 5. The initial increase of d f with p r is quite steep but becomes shallower at p r ≥ 0.2, as shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Comparisons To Generative Network Modelssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…87 Higher values of p r were shown to reduce the characteristic length scale in WS networks, which increases d f . 88 In the random limit (p r = 1), d f increases with the number of nodes, n. 89 Similarly, in this work, the fractal dimension, d f , of WS, LNP-R, and LP-R networks increases with larger p r as shown for LNP-R and LP-R networks in Figure 5. The initial increase of d f with p r is quite steep but becomes shallower at p r ≥ 0.2, as shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Comparisons To Generative Network Modelssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The existing body of work has demonstrated that randomness increases fractal dimension, d f , reduces average shortest path length, l, and suppresses local clustering. 25,80,[86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94] Consequently, the size-matched random ER and BR networks have values of d f higher by 0.6 to 1.1 units and values of C 4 smaller by one to three orders of magnitude in comparison to the RNs. BR networks show higher local clustering but are still much less ordered than RNs.…”
Section: Comparisons To Generative Network Modelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We plot in Figure 5 the evolution with L of the ratio of the proportion of "wet" sections-i.e., number of sections that have at least one inflow divided by the total number of sections-with scale. This ratio, hereafter called the wetting ratio r w , controls the evolution of K a (L) (see discussion above and (5)) and it can be used to identify a potential fractal nature of the flowing structure as it is classically done in box-counting methods [Mandelbrot, 1982, Pavón-Domínguez andMoreno-Pulido, 2022]. In a fractal of dimension D 1D in 1D, the number of wet sections decreases as (L/H ) D 1D with H the investigated borehole length (here 300 m), and the wetting ratio increases as r w ∼ (L/H ) 1−D 1D .…”
Section: Flow Structure Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediately following, Liu et al [22] adapted the Sandbox algorithm [23] for signal fractal analysis to multifractals of complex networks with a lower time complexity compared to previous algorithms. Pavón-Domínguez et al [24,25] analyzed multifractals of networks with another fixed-quality approach. The existing network multifractal studies only concern to limited scales that may loss some details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%