2003
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.67.066102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sandpile models and random walkers on finite lattices

Abstract: Abelian sandpile models, both deterministic, such as the Bak, Tang, Wiesenfeld (BTW) model [P. Bak, C. Tang and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987) L. The first few moments of this distribution are evaluated numerically and their dependence on the system size is examined. The sandpile models are conservative in the sense that grains are conserved in the bulk and can leave the system only through the boundaries. It is shown that the conservation law provides an interesting connection between sandpile… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore a crossover from diffusive to super diffusive sand transport occurs as RL is evolved to RN. It can be seen that not only the scaling of n φ and s φ are same but also the magnitude of n φ is just twice of s φ for both φ = 0 and φ = 1 on a given L. On RL it was already known that n φ = 2 s φ [35,40]. Such a relationship is then also valid on RN.…”
Section: Diffusive To Super Diffusive Sand Transportmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore a crossover from diffusive to super diffusive sand transport occurs as RL is evolved to RN. It can be seen that not only the scaling of n φ and s φ are same but also the magnitude of n φ is just twice of s φ for both φ = 0 and φ = 1 on a given L. On RL it was already known that n φ = 2 s φ [35,40]. Such a relationship is then also valid on RN.…”
Section: Diffusive To Super Diffusive Sand Transportmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…It should be noted here that on a two dimensional regular square lattice n φ ≈ aL + bL 2 , where a = 0.56 and b = 0.14 for small L [40]. However in the limit L → ∞, such a scaling can be approximated as n φ (L) ≈ 0.14L 2 .…”
Section: Diffusive To Super Diffusive Sand Transportmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These phenomena are frequently modelled by means of a class of cellular automata known as sandpile models [18] that can mimic financial distress propagation [24]; financial crisis fluctuations are described, at least qualitatively, by the avalanches of a sandpile model [25]. Conservation laws provide the connection between sandpile models and random-walk (diffusive) models [26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that all the α x (q)s do not converge for the BTW model upto q = 4 whereas in the case of SSM, there is a clear convergence of α x (q), which confirms that though the spatial structure is random fractal the BTW retains its multifractal behavior whereas the SSM obeys FSS. For lattices with integer dimension it is already known that the average toppling size s is equivalent to the average number of steps of a random walker on a given lattice before it reaches the boundary starting from an arbitrary lattice point [36,37]. Thus one could get a relation…”
Section: Probability Distribution Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%