2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sandy seepage faces as bioactive nitrate reactors: Biogeochemistry, microbial ecology and metagenomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 91 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is difficult, if not impossible, to replicate the complicated and variable conditions of STEs, which are influenced by a range of abiotic and biotic factors (Russoniello et al., 2016; Slomp & Cappellen, 2004). In situ studies are highly sensitive, include small‐scale heterogeneities, do not isolate processes from other subsurface reactions, and hydraulic gradients which may impact reaction rates remain unchanged (Bohlke et al., 2006; Jiang et al., 2023). The in situ tracer method is complex but is likely the best available method for measuring rates in groundwater systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult, if not impossible, to replicate the complicated and variable conditions of STEs, which are influenced by a range of abiotic and biotic factors (Russoniello et al., 2016; Slomp & Cappellen, 2004). In situ studies are highly sensitive, include small‐scale heterogeneities, do not isolate processes from other subsurface reactions, and hydraulic gradients which may impact reaction rates remain unchanged (Bohlke et al., 2006; Jiang et al., 2023). The in situ tracer method is complex but is likely the best available method for measuring rates in groundwater systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%