Śaṅkara and the authorship of Śvetāśvataropaniṣad-Bhāṣya

Andrijanić, Ivan

doi:10.1093/jhs/hiy014

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, there are numerous other historical, terminological, and doctrinal peculiarities discussed in previous Indological scholarship that further affirm the authenticity of the commentaries on other older Upaniṣads (except the Śvetāśvatara) (e.g. Marschner 1933;Mayeda 1967;1967-8;Andrijanić 2020a;2020b) and the Bhagavad-Gītā (Mayeda 1965a), as well as the Upadeśasāhasrī (Mayeda 1965b).…”

Section: The Philosophical Content Of the Poem And The Structure Of I...supporting

confidence: 55%

Ātmabodha

Andrijanić

2024

Disput. philos. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article examines the authorship and dating of Ātmabodha, a popular philosophical poem that, in a popular and poetically imaginative manner, expounds on the main teachings of the Indian philosophical school of Advaita Vedānta. Although traditionally attributed to the renowned philosopher Śaṅkara (8th century), the article presents arguments for placing the work several centuries after Śaṅkara. In addition to the state–of–the–art stylometric method, the General Imposters Framework, which does not recognize Ātmabodha as Śaṅkara’s work, Ātmabodha also does not meet Hacker’s colophon criterion. The paper places particular emphasis on instances of post–Śaṅkarite doctrinal and terminological developments in Ātmabodha, specifically in the comprehension of the concept of ignorance, alongside the introduction of later terminology and concepts. The available evidence suggests a tentative dating of the work between the 11th and early 14th centuries.

show abstract

Section: The Philosophical Content Of the Poem And The Structure Of I...supporting

confidence: 55%

Ātmabodha

Andrijanić

2024

Disput. philos. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All these works are included in collected works of Śaṅkara 29 and they all pass Hacker's criteria of being attributed to Śaṅkara-bhagavat(pūjya)-pāda in colophons. Moreover, ĪUBh, KaUBh, BhG and ChUBh already passed two stylometric tests on limited corpus (Andrijanić 2020a(Andrijanić , 2020b. ĪUBh, KeUBh, KaUBh, BhGBh and Gauḍapādīyabhāṣya (GauBh) also pass Hacker's (1950) terminological criteria (Mayeda 1965a(Mayeda , 1965b(Mayeda , 1967(Mayeda , 1967(Mayeda -1968Andrijanić 2020a).…”

Section: Authenticity Of Prose Texts Attributed To śAṅkaramentioning

confidence: 93%

“…ce) 2 , to whom a vast number of texts is ascribed in manuscript colophons and by monastic tradition. 3 In two articles, Andrijanić (2020aAndrijanić ( , 2020b experimented with an authorship verification method named the General Imposters (GI) framework in order to assess the accuracy of the method on Sanskrit philosophical texts. 4 As the method gave satisfactory results in verifying authorship of undisputed texts, 5 Andrijanić (2020a;2020b) verified traditional attribution of the Kaṭhopaniṣadbhāṣya (KaUBh), Īśopaniṣadbhāṣya (ĪUBh) and Chāndogyopaniṣadbhāṣya (ChUBh) to Śaṅkara.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Authenticity of Prose Writings Attributed to Śaṅkara

Andrijanić,

Bąkowski

2023

AAV

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Śaṅkara is traditionally considered the author of an exceptionally large number of works. Indological scholarship has attempted to filter out some of these works within traditional philological and historical frameworks. Many were, however, taken for granted to be authentic, and no serious research into their authenticity has been conducted. This paper attempts a computational stylometric approach to establish the authenticity of prose commentaries attributed to Śaṅkara. The General Imposters (GI) framework appears to be the most suitable existing method developed for the purpose of verifying authorship. The GI calculates the statistical distance between certain texts’ features and estimates whether the disputed text is closer to the candidate author than to a set of texts that may not have been composed by him. The paper also presents a machine-based method for separating the words and resolving the sandhi in the Sanskrit text, crucial for the procedure. The success rate in verifying authors of undisputed texts appears to be acceptable enough to proceed to the next step, where 18 prose commentaries traditionally attributed to Śaṅkara are subjected to the GI verification procedure. The result conforms to the most conservative assessments of Śaṅkara’s authorship; GI verified the authenticity of the commentaries on the principal Upaniṣads (with the exception of the commentary on the Śvetāśvataropaniṣad) and on the Bhagavadgītā. Besides these, commentaries on the Nṛsiṃha-(pūrva)-tāpanīyopaniṣad and the Adhyātmapaṭala were, rather unexpectedly, also successfully verified as genuine works of Śaṅkara.

show abstract

The Reliability of Hacker’s Criteria for Determining Śaṅkara’s Authorship

Andrijanić

2022

DHARM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Śaṅkara and the authorship of Śvetāśvataropaniṣad-Bhāṣya

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Ātmabodha

Ātmabodha

On the Authenticity of Prose Writings Attributed to Śaṅkara

The Reliability of Hacker’s Criteria for Determining Śaṅkara’s Authorship

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About