2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70511-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sap flow of Amorpha fruticosa: implications of water use strategy in a semiarid system with secondary salinization

Abstract: A. fruticosa (Amorpha fruticosa L.) is widely used for revegetation in semiarid lands that undergo secondary salinization. Understanding A. fruticosa plants response to soil water and salt stress is essential for water irrigation management and proper revegetation practices. In this study, we measured sap flow, stomatal conductance, meteorological and soil characteristics in an A. fruticosa community that recently experienced secondary salinization in northwestern China. Results of our study showed that daytim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VPD is an also important factor controlling stomata opening, in particular, stomata are inclined to close in high VPD conditions to minimize water loss in dry environment (Huang et al, 2021; Li et al, 2021; Tong et al, 2023). However, the plants' response to high VPD also vary with tree water use strategy (Cao et al, 2020; Elisenda et al, 2015), isohydric trees usually respond to water stress sensitively through stomatal closure to avoid excessive water loss, while anisohydric trees usually maintain high transpiration despite of a fast decline of leaf potential (Mrad et al, 2019; Vogt, 2001; Wu et al, 2018). The sap flux density of oak at our site showed clear characteristic of anisohydric trees and a quadratic response pattern is found in this study (see in Figure 9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VPD is an also important factor controlling stomata opening, in particular, stomata are inclined to close in high VPD conditions to minimize water loss in dry environment (Huang et al, 2021; Li et al, 2021; Tong et al, 2023). However, the plants' response to high VPD also vary with tree water use strategy (Cao et al, 2020; Elisenda et al, 2015), isohydric trees usually respond to water stress sensitively through stomatal closure to avoid excessive water loss, while anisohydric trees usually maintain high transpiration despite of a fast decline of leaf potential (Mrad et al, 2019; Vogt, 2001; Wu et al, 2018). The sap flux density of oak at our site showed clear characteristic of anisohydric trees and a quadratic response pattern is found in this study (see in Figure 9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural soil moisture in sandy land varies with different landforms, the primary productive forces were distributed in blocks relying on the water characteristics of different geomorphic positions, as a result, the biomass produced in the small area accounted for most of the total biomass of the sandy land, which provided the basis for dune fixation and psammophyte community restoration and reconstruction. formula (10) shows the principle of soil water deficit caused by shrub consumption and free gravity water replenished by precipitation , and on the whole, reflecting the mechanism of soil water movement in sandy land.…”
Section: Fig 6 Mapping Between Pure Imaginary Storage Capacity and Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the tree characteristics found to be significant were angles of tree deviations from the axis, stem moisture, temperature inside the trunk, and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI; Safargalieva et al 2021), highly correlated with leaf biomass. Some of the environmental variables found to be significant include soil water potential (Ježík et al 2015, Cao et al 2020, Korakaki and Fotelli 2021, solar radiation and vapor-pressure deficit (VPD; Ježík et al 2015, Korakaki and Fotelli 2021, Safargalieva et al 2021, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR; Cao et al 2020, Suárez et al 2021, air temperature (Cao et al 2020), surface terrains causing variations in slope (Kume et al 2016, Schoppach et al 2021 and aspect (Hassler et al 2018), and soil texture (Hassler et al 2018). Tree density was found to be another important driver of sap flow variability (Hassler et al 2018, Suárez et al 2021.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%