2019
DOI: 10.3959/1536-1098-75.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sapwood Rings Estimation for Pinus Sylvestris L. In Lithuania and Latvia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Network sites cover different portions of the distribution range of each species (Figure 1). We relied on chronologies that were previously developed for dendroclimatological (Cedro, 2004;Cedro & Cedro, 2018;Helama, Sohar, Läänelaid, Bijak, & Jaagus, 2018;Jansons, Matisons, Šēnhofa, Katrevičs, & Jansons, 2016;Läänelaid, Sohar, & Meikar, 2008;Matisons, Elferts, & Brūmelis, 2013;Sohar, Vitas, & Läänelaid, 2012;Vitas, 2004Vitas, , 2006Vitas, , 2011 and dendroecological analyses (Scharnweber et al, 2011;Scharnweber, Manthey, & Wilmking, 2013;van der Maaten, Mehl, Wilmking, & van der Maaten-Theunissen, 2017;van der Maaten-Theunissen et al, 2016;Vitas & Zunde, 2019;Weigel et al, 2018), as well as chronologies from the International Tree-Ring Database (ITRDB; n = 42 sites) and chronologies not previously published (n = 42 sites; Table S1).…”
Section: Tree-ring Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network sites cover different portions of the distribution range of each species (Figure 1). We relied on chronologies that were previously developed for dendroclimatological (Cedro, 2004;Cedro & Cedro, 2018;Helama, Sohar, Läänelaid, Bijak, & Jaagus, 2018;Jansons, Matisons, Šēnhofa, Katrevičs, & Jansons, 2016;Läänelaid, Sohar, & Meikar, 2008;Matisons, Elferts, & Brūmelis, 2013;Sohar, Vitas, & Läänelaid, 2012;Vitas, 2004Vitas, , 2006Vitas, , 2011 and dendroecological analyses (Scharnweber et al, 2011;Scharnweber, Manthey, & Wilmking, 2013;van der Maaten, Mehl, Wilmking, & van der Maaten-Theunissen, 2017;van der Maaten-Theunissen et al, 2016;Vitas & Zunde, 2019;Weigel et al, 2018), as well as chronologies from the International Tree-Ring Database (ITRDB; n = 42 sites) and chronologies not previously published (n = 42 sites; Table S1).…”
Section: Tree-ring Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, regional studies about sapwood statistics for pine are sparse if existing at all. For pine trees 100-200 years or older, there are often 50 to 85 sapwood rings [89], but extremes in the range from 30 to 120 sapwood rings have been noted in our review of the reports. An alternative method to estimate missing sapwood rings is to assume that the thickness of the sapwood appears constant for trees growing under similar ecological conditions, or for trees of similar ages and growth rates [90].…”
Section: Estimation Of the Felling Yearmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although the climate-growth analysis did not show any significant differences between fire and non-fire years for the dry pine sites, there is evidence that fire occurrence is also related to climatic events [97,98]. The main causes for the reduced growth of tree rings (signature years) are climatic events such as droughts, winter temperatures, and spring frosts [99,100]. Studies on Scots pine with a master chronology from Lithuania found multiple years with significantly reduced growth [99,101].…”
Section: Dendrochronology Climate Change and Fire Riskmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The main causes for the reduced growth of tree rings (signature years) are climatic events such as droughts, winter temperatures, and spring frosts [99,100]. Studies on Scots pine with a master chronology from Lithuania found multiple years with significantly reduced growth [99,101]. In our study, we identified multiple signature years on the dry Scots pine sites (1879, 1889, 1920, 1943-1944, 1979-1981, 1986-1987, 1993-1996, 2000-2001, and 2013) with reduced growth, of which some match (indicated in bold).…”
Section: Dendrochronology Climate Change and Fire Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%