2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05810-8_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAQR: An Efficient Scheme for Similarity-Aware Query Refinement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The input to the refinement process is an initial select-project query I , which is to be transformed into a refined query R. Query I is a conjunctive query defined in terms of d range predicates 2 …”
Section: Query Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The input to the refinement process is an initial select-project query I , which is to be transformed into a refined query R. Query I is a conjunctive query defined in terms of d range predicates 2 …”
Section: Query Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C R = number of probes made to the evaluation layer (2) In this work, we follow the same approach as in [4,23], in which we consider the probing operation for aggregation estimation as a blackbox and our goal is to minimize the number of such probes. Endeavoring to reduce that incurred cost (i.e., C R ), it has been shown that simple local search techniques based on greedy heuristics (e.g., Hill Climbing) often provide efficient and effective solutions to the aggregate-based query refinement problem, as in [4,13] where the constraint is cardinality.…”
Section: Aggregate-based Query Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAQR [84] proposed scheme for similarity-aware refinement of aggregate queries, which satisfy the aggregate and similarity constraints imposed on the refined query and maximize its overall utility. The recent research with similarities to our work is [85], however their goal is to generate set of alternative queries to meet the constraint on similarity to the original query and the aggregate constraint.…”
Section: Query Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicate that is not included in T is equivalent to L i ≤ P i ≤ U i . Similar to [82,84], we convert the range predicated into two single sided predicates. Therefore, l i ≤ P i ≤ u i is converted to two predicates: P i ≤ u i −P i ≤ −l i .…”
Section: Query Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation