2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sarcomere length organization as a design for cooperative function amongst all lumbar spine muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SMA MNs exhibit selective vulnerability depending on the muscles they innervate, with proximal muscles more affected than distal muscles in mice 14 and humans 15 . We previously reported that SMA MNs in the first lumbar segment (L1) exhibit an increase in input resistance early in the disease 13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SMA MNs exhibit selective vulnerability depending on the muscles they innervate, with proximal muscles more affected than distal muscles in mice 14 and humans 15 . We previously reported that SMA MNs in the first lumbar segment (L1) exhibit an increase in input resistance early in the disease 13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study vulnerable MNs, we focused on those that innervate the iliopsoas (IL) and quadratus lumborum (QL) muscles 13,14 . These muscles are involved in maintaining posture and locomotion 15 and are involved in the righting reflex which is impaired in SMA mouse models 13 . The IL/QL MNs reside within the L1 to L3 spinal segments 16 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multifidus (measured from both surgical patient biopsies 48 and cadavers 52 ), as well as erector spinae 52 have short sarcomere lengths (ie, significantly below optimal force generating length), and thus a limited ability to generate force, when in the neutral spine posture. As the spine flexes, the muscles (and thus sarcomeres) lengthen and are able to generate maximum forces in mid‐flexed to fully flexed spine positions 48,52 . Comparing passive mechanical properties of the multifidus and erector spinae in patients undergoing spine surgery has revealed that multifidus fiber bundles (muscle fibers ensheathed in their connective tissue matrix), but not individual fibers, have a significantly higher elastic modulus (higher stiffness) 53 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, 29 In moderately flexed postures, improved length-tension relationships of these muscles allow improved neuromuscular efficiency and the multifidus to resist shear forces. 5,7,38,48,51 When designing low back exercises, erector spinae muscle endurance should be considered. Erector spinae and multifidus muscles have a high percentage of type I fibres, and following low back injury there is often an increase in the percentage of type II fibres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). 51 Although elongation of the erector spinae in flexed lumbar postures may improve the ability to generate force and neuromuscular efficiency (ratio of EM output to muscle activation), a potential downside of the muscle lengthening is a significant reduction in inter-compartmental muscle volume at all lumbar levels. 55 This is of concern when the lumbar spine remains in flexion for prolonged periods of time, as human and animal studies have shown an increase in intramuscular pressure and a reduction in intramuscular blood flow and elevated levels of neuropeptides when lumbar muscle volume reduces.…”
Section: Fibre Type Of the Erector Spinae And Multifidusmentioning
confidence: 99%