Sardonic science? The resistance to more humanistic forms of science education

Abstract

Resistance to more humanistic forms of science education is an endemic and persistent feature of university scientists as well as school science teachers. This article argues that science education researchers should pay more attention to its origins and to the subtleties of its stubborn influence. The paper explores some of the imperatives which dominate the continuing practices of teachers; the linkages between school and university science; and re-considers the relationships between learning science, learning to do science and learning about science. It draws on recent, prominent publications, as well as neglected and rather more contentious material, to underline the unhelpfully narrow view of science held by those who defend the traditional disciplinary influences of biology, chemistry and physics. Suggestions are made as to where those of a more radical and determined disposition should direct their attention in the interests of improved education, vital scientific progress as well as human survival. It is argued that university science must change in order to ensure that teachers better help their students to learn, do and appreciate science

The Benefits of Cooperative Learning to Socio-scientific Discussion in Secondary School Science

“…Moreover, the pupils indicated that participation in these discussion lessons had helped them to see the relevance of science to their life (53.6% overall). These findings provide support for the claim that the inclusion of socio-scientific discussion within science education helps to promote both the learning of the basic science that impacts the issue under discussion, but also the pupils' development towards a functional scientific literacy (Aikenhead, 2006;Bryce, 2010;Bryce & Gray, 2004;Gray & Bryce, 2006;Sadler, 2004;Zeidler & Keefer, 2003). However, the data in Table 2 also show that for item J11, overall only 47.4% of pupils would like to discuss other topics, with females being more positive in this item than males (52.9% of females vs. 41.7% of males).…”

“…However, traditionally the emphasis of Scottish science education is on preparing pupils for specialisation in the sciences. This has been described as the 'pipeline' (Aikenhead, 2006;Bryce, 2010;Kind & Taber, 2005), indicating that school science education currently functions as a filtering mechanism which feeds pupils through the system to become the next generation of scientists, clinicians and engineers.…”

Science teacher identity and eco-transformation of science education: comparing Western modernism with Confucianism and reflexive Bildung

“…They wrote: "an STSE orientation presents a particular image of science teaching and a particular set of pedagogical challenges that are different from 'normal' patterns of practice" (p. 955). Tom Bryce (2010) has in this journal discussed the resistance to humanistic science education in practice. He contrasted the dominant Science-for-scientists view (emphasising content) with Science-for-citizenship (emphasising contextual complexities).…”

What Account of Science Shall We Give? A Case Study of Scientists Teaching First-year University Subjects

“…Vision 2 is an outward looking view that links specifically to situations involving both science and social issues that are relevant to students' lives. Traditionally Vision 1 has been at the heart of most university science courses and much of school science, and to a large extent it remains so (Bryce, 2010;Miller et al, 2008;Osborne, 2010). As already mentioned, the notion of Vision 1 and Vision 2 was intended to be a heuristic rather than a pigeonholing device.…”