2022
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2022.3196383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARPointNet: An Automated Feature Learning Framework for Spaceborne SAR Image Registration

Abstract: Accurate registration between SAR images is the basis for high-precision geometric correction of SAR images. The feature points extracted by conventional feature extraction methods is unsatisfactory, which is affected by imaging geometric characteristics and speckle noise of SAR images. This paper innovatively proposes a spaceborne SAR image feature learning framework to realize automatic sample generation and model training. It mainly includes two modules: The feature sample generation module based on the ini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Registering two markedly dissimilar images poses a formidable challenge, as elucidated in our examination of the failure instances in Section 4.4.6. When the disparities between the two images slated for registration lie beyond the spectrum of variations encompassed by the training data, it may be necessary to resort to initial registration techniques such as geometric registration [5,50,51], block-based registration [52], or the integration of prior information, such as Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) and Ground Control Points (GCPs). In scenarios where neural-network-based approaches persist in being utilized, it becomes imperative to expand the scope of variations encompassed by the training dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Registering two markedly dissimilar images poses a formidable challenge, as elucidated in our examination of the failure instances in Section 4.4.6. When the disparities between the two images slated for registration lie beyond the spectrum of variations encompassed by the training data, it may be necessary to resort to initial registration techniques such as geometric registration [5,50,51], block-based registration [52], or the integration of prior information, such as Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) and Ground Control Points (GCPs). In scenarios where neural-network-based approaches persist in being utilized, it becomes imperative to expand the scope of variations encompassed by the training dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, Six representative matching algorithms (SIFT [19], SAR -SIFT [33], SAR PointNet [51], CFOG [22], RIFT [52], and MoTIF [53] ) including artificial feature matching algorithm and deep learning algorithm, were integrated with the framework first. Then different MAs were performed TPs matching from different RSI in Test Data 3.…”
Section: Framework Generality Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gain and offset values needed to be added to the image before calibration. Landsat8 OLI and GF-1 images were set according to the relevant parameters of the downloaded image file; this research uses the RPC module [33,34] in orthorectification, the RPC parameters included with GF-1 WFV data are used for correction, the DEM data required for correction is from ASTER satellite's 30 m spatial resolution GDEM product (https://www.gscloud.cn/ search?kw=GF-1 (accessed on 1 May 2022)), eliminating the geometric distortion caused by the influence of the mountain, and the deformation caused by the camera orientation; the atmospheric correction was performed on Landsat8 OLI and GF-1 WFV through the FLASSH atmospheric correction module [35,36]. As a result, the influence of external factors such as atmosphere and light on the image was eliminated, and a more accurate surface reflectance was obtained.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Image Dataset Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%