2021
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1882984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 detection in human milk: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings have been reported by Raschetti, et al [4], wherein lack of mother-neonate separation from birth was associated with late SARS-CoV-2 infections, while breastfeeding was not associated with increased risk. Recent systematic reviews have found a very low rate of detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in breastmilk, with a much higher prevalence of antibodies to the virus in the breastmilk [16,17]. The World Health Organization recommends that neonates should be roomed-in with mother and exclusively breastfed while following precautions to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection to neonates [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings have been reported by Raschetti, et al [4], wherein lack of mother-neonate separation from birth was associated with late SARS-CoV-2 infections, while breastfeeding was not associated with increased risk. Recent systematic reviews have found a very low rate of detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in breastmilk, with a much higher prevalence of antibodies to the virus in the breastmilk [16,17]. The World Health Organization recommends that neonates should be roomed-in with mother and exclusively breastfed while following precautions to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection to neonates [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 Another systematic review reported that SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in breast milk was 2.16%. 29 The biggest study to date included 110 women in the USA (n=65 testing positive for SARS-CoV-2) and showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was present in 6% of the milk samples; however, no infectious viral particles could be isolated by cell culture. 8 By using SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 surrogates and a non-enveloped viral model (MgV), we define the analytical performance (eg, recovery and LoD) of a specific protocol able to efficiently isolate and detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in breast milk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral RNA was detected in milk for 4 consecutive days, and its presence coincided with mild COVID-19 symptoms and a SARS-CoV-2-positive diagnostic test for the newborn. However, whether the newborn was infected by breastfeeding or by other modes of transmission remains unclear[ 76 ]. In another study performed on two participants, only 50% of human milk samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, suggesting that the virus is shed intermittently in the milk[ 77 ].…”
Section: Under Pandemic Conditions Breastfeeding Provides the Best Seeding Of The Gm For Newbornsmentioning
confidence: 99%