2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.30.474519
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 diverges from other betacoronaviruses in only partially activating the IRE1α/XBP1 ER stress pathway in human lung-derived cells

Abstract: Despite the efficacy of vaccines, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has killed over 5 million individuals worldwide and continues to spread in countries where the vaccines are not yet widely available or its citizens are hesitant to become vaccinated. Therefore, it is critical to unravel the molecular mechanisms that allow SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses to infect and overtake the host machinery of human cells. Coronavirus replication triggers endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to RSV and IAV infection, the human CoVs demonstrate a distinct UPR profile. Three human coronaviruses (MERS-CoV, HCoV-OC43 and SARS-CoV-2) replicate efficiently in IRE1 deficient cells, suggesting IRE1 activation is not necessary for CoV replication [163]. Extensive and prolonged induction of IRE1 in CoV infection may in fact favour a pro-apoptotic response rather than beneficial responses such as increased chaperone expression aimed at restoring homeostasis [163].…”
Section: Covmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to RSV and IAV infection, the human CoVs demonstrate a distinct UPR profile. Three human coronaviruses (MERS-CoV, HCoV-OC43 and SARS-CoV-2) replicate efficiently in IRE1 deficient cells, suggesting IRE1 activation is not necessary for CoV replication [163]. Extensive and prolonged induction of IRE1 in CoV infection may in fact favour a pro-apoptotic response rather than beneficial responses such as increased chaperone expression aimed at restoring homeostasis [163].…”
Section: Covmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three human coronaviruses (MERS-CoV, HCoV-OC43 and SARS-CoV-2) replicate efficiently in IRE1 deficient cells, suggesting IRE1 activation is not necessary for CoV replication [163]. Extensive and prolonged induction of IRE1 in CoV infection may in fact favour a pro-apoptotic response rather than beneficial responses such as increased chaperone expression aimed at restoring homeostasis [163]. Although SARS-CoV-2 induces IRE1, downstream XBP1 splicing is actually suppressed by the virus, perhaps to limit cytokine signalling that could trigger detection by the host immune system [163].…”
Section: Covmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IRE1α has broad regulatory roles and consequences for infection and immunity. For example, the IRE1α-XBP1S axis can promote the expression of proinflammatory cytokines 6,22 , modulate metabolic plasticity 24 , and promote ER homeostasis 25 during infection. Additionally, IRE1α can facilitate intra-organelle communication for ER-mitochondria calcium signaling and promotion of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation 12,13,26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%