2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 reinfection prevents acute respiratory disease in Syrian hamsters but not replication in the upper respiratory tract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nasal swabs showed low levels of virus in vaccinated animals, but at about two log significantly reduced levels compared to control NHPs (Fig. 5A), consistent with reports of detectable virus replication in upper airways in animals that were protected from clinical disease ( 52 ). For SARS-1 challenged animals, mosaic-8b immunized NHPs had no detectable viral titers in either BAL or nasal swabs, whereas all control animals had detectable viral titers (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Nasal swabs showed low levels of virus in vaccinated animals, but at about two log significantly reduced levels compared to control NHPs (Fig. 5A), consistent with reports of detectable virus replication in upper airways in animals that were protected from clinical disease ( 52 ). For SARS-1 challenged animals, mosaic-8b immunized NHPs had no detectable viral titers in either BAL or nasal swabs, whereas all control animals had detectable viral titers (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We previously showed that the Omicron BA.1 variant is antigenically distinct from the other SARS-CoV-2 variants [ 16 ], and several studies have shown that neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain have limited neutralizing capacity against the Omicron BA.1. Although a recent study has proven that hamsters with a heterologous re-challenge are protected from B.1.1.7 (Alpha) and B.1.351 (Beta) induced acute pneumonia, already 14 days after initial infection, the cross-protective potential towards Omicron BA.1 was not investigated [ 32 ]. Interestingly, despite the antigenic distance and early time point for re-infection, the 614G convalescent group was completely protected from any pathological alterations of the respiratory tract after infection with Omicron BA.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mucosal COVID-19 vaccines have been experimentally shown to reduce upper respiratory shedding, but not transmission, when assessed in a single contact transmission chain setting [ 30 32 ]. In addition, hamster studies have shown that previous infection protects against disease, but not upper respiratory tract replication, after homologous and heterologous reinfection [ 27 , 34 36 ]. Similar dynamics were observed in our experimental setup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%