SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and transmission risk factors among high-risk close contacts: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background The proportion of asymptomatic carriers and transmission risk factors of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among household and non-household contacts remains unclear. In Singapore, extensive contact tracing by the Ministry of Health for every diagnosed COVID-19 case, and legally enforced quarantine and intensive health surveillance of close contacts provided a rare opportunity to determine asymptomatic attack rates and SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk factors among community close contacts of patients with COVID-19. Methods This retrospective cohort study involved all close contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Singapore, identified between Jan 23 and April 3, 2020. Household contacts were defined as individuals who shared a residence with the index COVID-19 case. Non-household close contacts were defined as those who had contact for at least 30 min within 2 m of the index case. All patients with COVID-19 in Singapore received inpatient treatment, with access restricted to health-care staff. All close contacts were quarantined for 14 days with thrice-daily symptom monitoring via telephone. Symptomatic contacts underwent PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2. Secondary clinical attack rates were derived from the prevalence of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 among close contacts. Consenting contacts underwent serology testing and detailed exposure risk assessment. Bayesian modelling was used to estimate the prevalence of missed diagnoses and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive cases. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk factors. Findings Between Jan 23 and April 3, 2020, 7770 close contacts (1863 household contacts, 2319 work contacts, and 3588 social contacts) linked to 1114 PCR-confirmed index cases were identified. Symptom-based PCR testing detected 188 COVID-19 cases, and 7582 close contacts completed quarantine without a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Among 7518 (96·8%) of the 7770 close contacts with complete data, the secondary clinical attack rate was 5·9% (95% CI 4·9–7·1) for 1779 household contacts, 1·3% (0·9–1·9) for 2231 work contacts, and 1·3% (1·0–1·7) for 3508 social contacts. Bayesian analysis of serology and symptom data obtained from 1150 close contacts (524 household contacts, 207 work contacts, and 419 social contacts) estimated that a symptom-based PCR-testing strategy missed 62% (95% credible interval 55–69) of COVID-19 diagnoses, and 36% (27–45) of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection were asymptomatic. Sharing a bedroom (multivariable odds ratio [OR] 5·38 [95% CI 1·82–15·84]; p=0·0023) and being spoken to by an index case for 30 min or longer (7·86 [3·86–16·02]; p<0·0001) were associated with SARS-CoV-2 transmission among household contacts. Among non-household contacts, exposure to more than one case (multivariable OR 3·92 [95% CI 2·07–7·40], p<0·0001), being spoken to by an index case for 30 min or longer (2·67 [1·21–5·88]; p=0·...

Sero-surveillance for IgG to SARS-CoV-2 at antenatal care clinics in two Kenyan referral hospitals

“…The proportion of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections that have been reported as asymptomatic ranges from 36%-49% [1][2][3][4] ; in India 94% of a random population sample who had detectable antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 reported having had no symptoms 5 . Symptoms are more common with increasing age and therefore the proportion of infections that are asymptomatic differs with the age-structure of each population.…”

“…Women were asked about the full list of COVID-19 symptoms as per the MOH COVID-19 screening form i.e. fever/ chills, general weakness, cough, sore throat, runny nose, shortness of breath, diarrhoea, nausea/ vomiting, headache, irritability/ confusion, pain (muscular/ chest/ abdominal/ joint) 2. No age, trimester or symptom data were available from the ANC records at KCH.…”

Risk at mass-gathering events and the usefulness of complementary events during COVID-19 pandemic

“…A published study estimated that 36% of infections result in asymptomatic individuals 9 . Although viral transmission from asymptomatic individuals contributes to the disease spread, the relative risk of the transmission from asymptomatic individuals is 35% compared with that of symptomatic people 10 .…”

Occupational hazards in anaesthesiology during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Main considerations regard the duration of exposure (the more prolonged the exposure, the higher the risk) [26], the mechanism and intensity of aerosol generation [28][29][30], as well as direct contact with contaminated and potentially contaminated surfaces (such as PPE during doffing) [12]. the importance of the latter is backed by identification of infectious viral particles in some of the samples taken from contaminated surfaces [31].…”