2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.17.21251926
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 shedding dynamics across the respiratory tract, sex and disease severity for adult and pediatric COVID-19

Abstract: Background: SARS-CoV-2 shedding dynamics in the upper (URT) and lower respiratory tract (LRT) remain unclear. Objective: To analyze SARS-CoV-2 shedding dynamics across COVID-19 severity, the respiratory tract, sex and age cohorts (aged 0 to 17 years, 18 to 59 years, and 60 years or older). Design: Systematic review and pooled analyses. Setting: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science Core Collection, medRxiv and bioRxiv were searched up to 20 November 2020. Participants: The systematic dataset included … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forced exhalation approach appeared much less sensitive (i.e. 22% positive agreement) in this student group (average ~22 years old, ambulatory, upright position during sampling) as compared to the first study on a cohort of hospitalized patients (average ~62 years old, in-patient, recumbent position during sampling), suggesting a possible effect of age, sampling position, a lower respiratory tract infection prompting admission, or another covariate not assessed within this study 19,20 . The observed difference in positive percentage agreement between breathing techniques (22% vs 74%) is striking and warrants further research.…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 Detection In Exhaled Particlesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The forced exhalation approach appeared much less sensitive (i.e. 22% positive agreement) in this student group (average ~22 years old, ambulatory, upright position during sampling) as compared to the first study on a cohort of hospitalized patients (average ~62 years old, in-patient, recumbent position during sampling), suggesting a possible effect of age, sampling position, a lower respiratory tract infection prompting admission, or another covariate not assessed within this study 19,20 . The observed difference in positive percentage agreement between breathing techniques (22% vs 74%) is striking and warrants further research.…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 Detection In Exhaled Particlesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…As severe COVID-19 is associated with high, persistent SARS-CoV-2 shedding in the lower respiratory tract (P. Z. Chen et al, 2021) and small particles are typically generated there (Johnson et al, 2011), severe cases may also expel higher quantities of virions via smaller aerosols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the well-defined cohort of participants we studied allowed for direct, minimally-invasive access to the LRT for vRNA quantification in ETA specimens, which are routinely obtained for clinical microbiology studies in COVID-19 subjects, as opposed to invasive bronchoscopic samples. We did not analyze upper respiratory tract vRNA levels, because our focus was to examine LRT viral burden and its relationship with plasma vRNA levels in patients with severe disease, and viral shedding in severe COVID-19 has been reported to be prolonged in the lower as compared to the upper respiratory tract [11]. Our findings also highlight the importance of analyzing the timing of measurement of vRNA biomarkers in relation to the clinical timeline of COVID-19, given the rapid and dynamic decline of vRNA levels in both the LRT and blood compartments.…”
Section: (Which Was Not Certified By Peer Review)mentioning
confidence: 99%