2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.11.05.21265978
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 testing and COVID-19 related primary care use among people with citizenship, permanent residency, and temporary immigration status in British Columbia: Cross-sectional analysis of population-based administrative data

Abstract: BackgroundHaving temporary immigration status affords limited rights, workplace protections, and access to services. There is not yet research data on impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic for people with temporary immigration status in Canada.MethodsWe use linked administrative data to describe SARS-CoV-2 testing, positive tests, and COVID-19 primary care service use in British Columbia from January 1, 2020, to July 31, 2021, stratified by immigration status (Citizen, Permanent Resident, Temporary Resident). We pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,16 This changes the calculation to the remaining 3,400 doctors theoretically each caring for ∼1,618 patients each. This larger number poses a potential excessive work volume, which compounds the other major flaw of the calculation: the assumption that all actual needs of patients can be met by their family doctor, [17][18][19] that all family doctors will work the same hours and with the same set of skills, 16,20 and that practice infrastructure will work seamlessly without creating any extra work for physicians. 21,22 In fact, patients are not interchangeable units of work, neither are family physicians interchangeable workers.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15,16 This changes the calculation to the remaining 3,400 doctors theoretically each caring for ∼1,618 patients each. This larger number poses a potential excessive work volume, which compounds the other major flaw of the calculation: the assumption that all actual needs of patients can be met by their family doctor, [17][18][19] that all family doctors will work the same hours and with the same set of skills, 16,20 and that practice infrastructure will work seamlessly without creating any extra work for physicians. 21,22 In fact, patients are not interchangeable units of work, neither are family physicians interchangeable workers.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research tells us there is significant variation in patient needs 18,19,[23][24][25] and physician practice patterns. 16,20,26 For example, some doctors may work in neighbourhoods or with sub-populations whose needs are more complex and therefore each patient visit needs more time and/or resources, meaning fewer patients can be seen.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%