2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination elicits unconventional IgM specific responses in naïve and previously COVID-19-infected individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
51
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
9
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, IgM response peaked after the second vaccine dose, and we observed strong correlations between IgM and IgG responses after the first and second doses (Fig. 2A and S8A), indicating the simultaneous production of IgM and IgG, as reported previously ( 36 ), irrespective of age. Although the antibody levels were highly variable among individuals, even within the same age cohort, we observed a negative correlation between age and peak IgG titers after the second dose (r = −0.39; p < 0.001) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Additionally, IgM response peaked after the second vaccine dose, and we observed strong correlations between IgM and IgG responses after the first and second doses (Fig. 2A and S8A), indicating the simultaneous production of IgM and IgG, as reported previously ( 36 ), irrespective of age. Although the antibody levels were highly variable among individuals, even within the same age cohort, we observed a negative correlation between age and peak IgG titers after the second dose (r = −0.39; p < 0.001) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Extended studies that focus on the antibody levels triggered by infection and/or by vaccination have reported the existance of an entire panel of specific immunoglobulines 5 . Moreover, recent studies show that cross immunity against coronaviruses can be elicited by vaccination 6 but still we have to focus on the relevance of the booster vaccination. Within the total population, healthcare workers (HCW) represent the highly exposed populational segment to virus threatening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination of anti-RBD IgM revealed no significant differences between any of the groups tested, which is probably due to the time point at which samples were collected. Anti-RBD IgM levels are significantly decreased at 6 months post infection[18], in addition, vaccination does not elicit formation of anti-RBD IgM as natural infection [19], both reasons account for our finding of no significant difference in anti-RBD IgM levels. This study also indicated that anti-RBD IgG but not IgM was more important in complement activation following vaccination, where C5b-9 strongly and significantly correlated to the amount of bound C1q, which in turn strongly correlated to the amount of bound anti-RBD-IgG but not IgM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%