2008
DOI: 10.4135/9789351507734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAS²: A Guide to Collaborative Inquiry and Social Engagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
20

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
88
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…These tools were selected to elicit information on NFT species including phenology, agronomy, uses and markets, required to enhance income and collective forest management. The four tools were adapted from Sthapit et al (2006), De Boef and Thijssen (2007) and Chevalier and Buckles (2008).…”
Section: Participatory Methods and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools were selected to elicit information on NFT species including phenology, agronomy, uses and markets, required to enhance income and collective forest management. The four tools were adapted from Sthapit et al (2006), De Boef and Thijssen (2007) and Chevalier and Buckles (2008).…”
Section: Participatory Methods and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Duchesne & Haegel, 2009;Geoffrion, 2009;Liamputtong, 2011;Morgan, 2004;Stewart, Shamdasani, & Rook, 2007 (Chevalier & Buckles, 2008). Des exemples précis de l'approche SAS 2 sont présentés dans les descriptions ci-après, et on pourra ainsi les différencier des méthodes traditionnelles des focus groups.…”
Section: Méthodologieunclassified
“…and What can be done to incorporate voices traditionally left out of the process? (Chambers, 1983(Chambers, , 2006Chevalier & Buckles, 2008;Cornwall, 2008;Sarkissian & Hofer, 2008). In addition, power dynamic and asymmetries, social and cultural differences, and legal obligations including professional codes of ethics and Institutional Review Board requirements for community-engaged research and research about community-engaged teaching and learning are reviewed.…”
Section: Engaging With Diverse Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All systems approaches are concerned with understanding the dynamics of relationships between systems and among system components. Learners are expected to name the various contributors to community issues, including economic, social, behavioral, political, and environmental factors" (Jameson et al, 2012, p. 54); identify the boundaries of their project (i.e., what falls inside and outside project scope); describe how a variety of perspectives were included in community en-gagement activities (Chevalier & Buckles, 2008;Sarksissian & Hofer, 2008); and discuss the interrelationships and influences among various system components related to their community work.…”
Section: Approaches and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%