Sat0029 patient-Physician Discordance in Assessment of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Abstract

Background:In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), global disease activity is commonly assessed, from the patient’s and the physician’s perspective, through a 100mm VAS. Previous studies have commonly shown a considerable discrepancy between the patient’s and physician’s assessment.Objectives:This study aimed evaluating patient-physician discordance in the assessment of disease activity and to explore its determinants.Methods:Cross sectional study including RA patients (ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria), aged ≥ 18 years, followed in a single tertiary centre. Data were collected from the most recent evaluation including sociodemographic features, disease duration (years), disease activity (DAS 28 3V-PCR), tender and swollen joint count 0-28 (TJC and SJC), VAS-pain-patient, patient and physician global assessment (PGA and PhGA respectively), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CPR), Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and EuroQol five-dimension scale (EQ5D). The discrepancy between patients and physicians (ΔPPhGA) was defined as PGA minus PhGA, and a difference > |20mm| was considered as “discordant”. A descriptive analysis was performed and variables described as proportions or means (+/- SD), as adequate. Correlation between ΔPPhGA and other variables was assessed through Pearson’s correlation and comparison between groups through t-test. Variables with p<0.05 or otherwise considered clinically relevant were included in multiple linear regression analysis to identify predictors for ΔPPhGA. A p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:In total, 467 patients with RA were included (81.2% female; mean age 63.9% ± 12.2 years). PGA and PhGA were discordant in 61.7% of the cases, the patient scoring higher than the physician in 95% of these cases. The proportion of concordance increased (p< 0.01) when considering only patients in remission (DAS 28 3V <2.6), (Graph 1). ΔPPhGA was moderately correlated with VAS-pain-patient (r = 0.59) and weakly correlated with SJC (r = -0.12), HAQ (r= 0.27), EQ5D (r = -0.28) and age (r = 0.21); all p<0.01. In multivariate analysis, VAS-pain-patient (β 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88, p=0.00) and TJC (β 0.16, 95% CI 0.45-0.48, p=0.02) remained associated with a higher ΔPPhGA.Conclusion:Our study confirmed that a significant discrepancy between patients and physicians in the assessment of global disease activity is frequent in clinical practice, probably due to valorization of different parameters. This was much less pronounced among patients in remission. Higher VAS-pain-patient and TJC were independent predictors of greater discrepancy between patients and physician’s assessment.Disclosure of Interests:Luisa Brites: None declared, Flavio Costa: None declared, João Dinis de Freitas: None declared, Mariana Luis: None declared, Ana Rita Prata: None declared, Helena Assunção: None declared, LILIANA SARAIVA: None declared, Marlene Sousa: None declared, Ana Rita Cunha: None declared, José Antonio P. da Silva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Catia Duarte: None declared

Patient-reported outcomes in large vessel vasculitis: insights from a retrospective analysis of disease activity and associated factors

“…The correlation between patient and physician assessments was stronger when disease activity was relatively low. This trend is in line with findings from studies on SLE and Rheumatoid Arthritis, indicating that the agreement between patient and physician assessments diminishes at higher disease activity levels [ 3 , 19 , 20 ].…”

Determinants of patient and physician global assessments of disease activity in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis

“…These results are comparable to those reported by Harris et al ( 3 ) who found that patient and physician assessments in Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) correlated with one another at low but not at high levels of disease activity. Likewise, this effect was shown for Rheumatoid Arthritis ( 12 , 13 ), whereas an opposite trend was observed in the validation of the German Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ; for disease activity assessment in SLE ( 14 )).…”

Remission definitions guiding immunosuppressive therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: which is best fitted for the purpose?

“…16 It has also been hypothesised that PGA might be better substituted by the Physician's Global Assessment (PhGA) of disease activity, based on its correlation with objective measures of inflammation, sensitivity to change and ability to correct for common confounders, such as infection and patient-reported outcomes. [17][18][19][20][21][22] Therefore, we aimed to expand our previous study, and to test these newly proposed remission definitions, by assessing their impact on the rate of remission and its association with good radiographic and functional outcomes, the ultimate goals of T2T immunosuppressive therapy.…”