2020
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2020.1750061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satellite-based spectral mapping (ASTER and landsat data) of mineralogical signatures of beach sediments: a precursor insight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also notable that there are similar overall spectral signatures of all samples (Figure 5), irrespective of their depositional environment (Table 2), which means that the depositional environment of any one sediment sample cannot be resolved by their spectral signature alone. One potential reason for this is that all of the field sediment samples examined here are quartz-dominated (data not shown) and thus, variations in mineralogy cannot be considered as a significant control on their spectral signatures, unlike in previous studies, e.g., [29,47,54]. Although the spectral signature of interstitial water is a dominant feature in other previous studies of coastal sediments e.g., [25,26,32], we deliberately excluded this by drying the samples prior to analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also notable that there are similar overall spectral signatures of all samples (Figure 5), irrespective of their depositional environment (Table 2), which means that the depositional environment of any one sediment sample cannot be resolved by their spectral signature alone. One potential reason for this is that all of the field sediment samples examined here are quartz-dominated (data not shown) and thus, variations in mineralogy cannot be considered as a significant control on their spectral signatures, unlike in previous studies, e.g., [29,47,54]. Although the spectral signature of interstitial water is a dominant feature in other previous studies of coastal sediments e.g., [25,26,32], we deliberately excluded this by drying the samples prior to analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The same research approach was used by Ibrahim et al [19] along the Belgian coast. Grain size properties along beaches were examined using Landsat visible, near infrared (VNIR) and thermal infrared bands in SE India [29], but these bands may have been influenced by a high concentration of heavy minerals (50-80%) at this site. Using IKONOS imagery, Park et al [30] showed that all spectral bands have a good correlation (>0.8) with grain size, and Williams and Greeley [31] showed that different spectral bands from synthetic aperture radar imagery are affected by surface moisture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometric correction, re ectance calibration, and atmospheric corrections were carried out using Crosstalk correction software (for SWIR bands of ASTER data) and FLAASH (Fast line-of-sight Atmospheric Analysis of Spectral Hypercubes) modules [29][30][31] . In the present study, hyperspectral data analysis was carried out to bands 1-5 and band 7 of Landsat 8 whereas in ASTER the bands 1-9 are used.…”
Section: Satellite Data and Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, hyperspectral data analysis was carried out to bands 1-5 and band 7 of Landsat 8 whereas in ASTER the bands 1-9 are used. Integration of hyperspectral analysis techniques and multispectral data facilitate accurate mapping of mineral deposits 29,30,32,33 .…”
Section: Satellite Data and Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation