2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9111140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satellite-Derived Spatiotemporal Variations in Evapotranspiration over Northeast China during 1982–2010

Abstract: Evapotranspiration (ET) is a critical process for the climate system and water cycles. However, the spatiotemporal variations in terrestrial ET over Northeast China over the past three decades calculated from sparse meteorological point-based data remain large uncertain. In this paper, a recently proposed modified satellite-based Priestley-Taylor (MS-PT) algorithm was applied to estimate ET of Northeast China during 1982-2010. Validation results show that the square of the correlation coefficients (R 2 ) for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This product has been validated at 16 eddy covariance (EC) flux tower sites, and performed better than MODIS ET products at a regional scale, with a higher squared correlation coefficient (R 2 ) and a lower root mean square error (RMSE) [45]. The modified satellite-based Priestley-Taylor (MS-PT) product has provided more reliable and long-term spatiotemporal variations of the ET estimations of China [46].…”
Section: Et Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This product has been validated at 16 eddy covariance (EC) flux tower sites, and performed better than MODIS ET products at a regional scale, with a higher squared correlation coefficient (R 2 ) and a lower root mean square error (RMSE) [45]. The modified satellite-based Priestley-Taylor (MS-PT) product has provided more reliable and long-term spatiotemporal variations of the ET estimations of China [46].…”
Section: Et Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the first operation performed was the preprocessing of Landsat-8 images, that is, the conversion of digital numbers to physical values (PONZONI et al, 2012) and atmospheric correction by means of dark-object subtraction methodology (CHAVEZ, 1988), with the exception of the thermal band. Subsequently, the daily ETa was calculated, following the assumptions of the MS-PT model (YAO et al, 2013;ZHANG et al, 2017a). After the estimation of ETa, the daily biomass of the central pivots was calculated, using the model 2995 Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v. 40, n. 6, suplemento 2, p. 2991-3006, 2019…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous algorithms based on satellite images to estimate this parameter, both physical and empirical (ZHANG et al, 2016). Some of the well-known algorithms are: SEBAL -Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (BASTIAANSSEN et al, 1998); METRIC -Mapping EvapoTranspiration at high Resolution with Internalized Calibration (ALLEN et al, 2007); R-SSEB -Regional Simplified Surface Energy Balance (ARAÚJO et al, 2017); two-layer models (KUSTAS et al, 1996); SAFER -Simple Algorithm for Evapotranspiration Retrieving (TEIXEIRA, 2010); SSEBOP -Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SENAY et al, 2016); and MS-PT -Modified Satellite Priestley-Taylor (YAO et al, 2013;ZHANG et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation for 85 EC flux tower sites also indicated that the three machine learning algorithms used were reliable and robust for major land cover types in North America. Figures 9 and 10 both show that the ANN algorithm had no significant LE bias and yielded the closest LE to tower flux data Several previous studies have shown that spatial scale mismatch among different data sources, model input errors, and the limitations of the machine learning algorithms itself all affect the accuracy of LE estimation [7,10,56]. We used MERRA products with a spatial resolution of 1/2 • × 1/3 • and MODIS products with a resolution of 1 km, their resolution being greater than the footprint for field measurements, which is usually several hundred meters [57,58].…”
Section: Performance Of the Machine Learning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%