The 2005 hurricane season provided unprecedented opportunities for local television stations to serve the public interest in live, often commercial-free, coverage of severe weather. In this examination of four local television stations' coverage of four Atlantic hurricanes in two Southeastern markets, observed patterns of behavior culminated in the development of the Local Weather Continuous Coverage Model. The study showed that unlike their cable news counterparts, local television news continuous coverage prioritizes weather personnel over live, on-the-scene news reporting. Of all the weather tools used, radar was the most frequently used, followed by watch and warning graphics.The 2005 hurricane season began as one of the most active in history and never seemed to let up. Even late in the year, forecasters were predicting that Gamma, the 24th storm of the busiest hurricane season on record, could threaten south Florida. These hurricanes and similar natural disasters prompted local news operations and their meteorologists to spring into action. Some reporters have documented stories of hurricane coverage assignments that, while planned for 72 hours, ended up lasting as long as 11 days (Powers, Meyer, & Ryan, 2005), whereas others have made local newspaper headlines for challenging local officials on behalf of viewers (McDaniel, 2005). One newspaper writer received 1,212 notes via email when he asked readers ''Did TV news go overboard covering Hurricane Rita?'' (Hoffman, 2005, p. 11).