2022
DOI: 10.5194/tc-16-349-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satellite passive microwave sea-ice concentration data set intercomparison using Landsat data

Abstract: Abstract. We report on results of an intercomparison of 10 global sea-ice concentration (SIC) data products at 12.5 to 50.0 km grid resolution from satellite passive microwave (PMW) observations. For this we use SIC estimated from >350 images acquired in the visible–near-infrared frequency range by the joint National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and United States Geological Survey (USGS) Landsat sensor during the years 2003–2011 and 2013–2015. Conditions covered are late winter/early spring i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several empirical algorithms have been developed to derive sea ice concentration from the passive microwave brightness temperatures (T B ), e.g., [4]. While substantial differences occur between products from different algorithms [5][6][7][8], trends and variability have been found to be generally consistent [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several empirical algorithms have been developed to derive sea ice concentration from the passive microwave brightness temperatures (T B ), e.g., [4]. While substantial differences occur between products from different algorithms [5][6][7][8], trends and variability have been found to be generally consistent [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this manuscript is to present the Version 4 CDR product and compare long-term extent and area trends from the CDR with the NT and BT products over both hemispheric and region scales. We do not include a specific validation here because the CDR is based on the NT and BT products that have been thoroughly validated, e.g., [7,8,18]. Here we focus on assessing the consistency between the products over their long-term time series from 1979 through 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the classification is based on surface broadband shortwave albedo derived from channels 3 (533-590 nm), 4 (636-673 nm), and 5 (851-879 nm) of the L8 Operational Land Imager sensor. The surface broadband shortwave albedo images needed for the final classification can be produced with an assumption that the top of atmosphere (TOA) reflectances are equivalent to the TOA albedo (α TOA ), which can be assumed to be related to the surface albedo (α surface ) by using the following equation (Kern and others, 2022):…”
Section: Landsat Validation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface broadband shortwave albedo images are then used in the supervised visual classification of open water and ice for the (Kern, 2021) dataset. An in-depth processing description can be found in (Kern and others, 2022). The final L8 SIC at 5 km gridding used for the PMW validation is produced by re-projecting the 30 m L8 data to the same EASE2 polar projection as the PMW data.…”
Section: Landsat Validation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite remote sensing has been used to produce many of the sea ice ECV datasets to obtain pan-Arctic coverage (Sandven et al, 2023). However, the passive microwave (PM) sea ice concentration, which is used to produce the sea ice area and extent is compromised by summer sea ice surface melt (Ivanova et al, 2015;Kern et al, 2019Kern et al, , 2020Kern et al, , 2022. PM L-band and altimeter sea ice thickness datasets do not provide their products in the presence of melt ponds (Huntemann et al, 2014;Patilea et al 2019;Ricker et al, 2017), and only recently an altimeter-based sea ice thickness retrieval coupled with a machine learning approach has been presented (Landy et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%