2017
DOI: 10.1002/rse2.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satellite remote sensing of ecosystem functions: opportunities, challenges and way forward

Abstract: Societal, economic and scientific interests in knowing where biodiversity is, how it is faring and what can be done to efficiently mitigate further biodiversity loss and the associated loss of ecosystem services are at an all-time high. So far, however, biodiversity monitoring has primarily focused on structural and compositional features of ecosystems despite growing evidence that ecosystem functions are key to elucidating the mechanisms through which biological diversity generates services to humanity. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
170
2
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
170
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kupschus, Schratzberger, & Righton, 2016) has grown substantially in the past decade, and these efforts could be used to support the identification of a relevant and practical framework for the monitoring and evaluation of rewilding projects. Satellite remote sensing, for example, offers promising avenues for the cost-effective monitoring of ecosystem processes, functions and services, and could help inform such a framework (Cord et al, 2017;Pettorelli et al, 2018).…”
Section: Identification and Characterisation Of The Likely Social Impmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kupschus, Schratzberger, & Righton, 2016) has grown substantially in the past decade, and these efforts could be used to support the identification of a relevant and practical framework for the monitoring and evaluation of rewilding projects. Satellite remote sensing, for example, offers promising avenues for the cost-effective monitoring of ecosystem processes, functions and services, and could help inform such a framework (Cord et al, 2017;Pettorelli et al, 2018).…”
Section: Identification and Characterisation Of The Likely Social Impmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used mapping systems and tools in plant management are traditional ground-based visual methods, handheld GPS (Global Positioning System), aerial and other remote methods [37], and innovative high-definition video systems [38]. Several applications (apps) for tracking invasive species with mobile smart phones have been developed in the USA (including iMapInvasives, IPAlert, IveGot1, IceGot1, Southeast Early Detection Network SEEDN, EDDMapS, What's Invasive, and Stink Bug Scout), and are used as invasive species management tools (http://ecospotinvasivespecies.weebly.com/mobile-apps-used-to-track-invasive-species.html).…”
Section: Case Study-biological Recording Of Ailanthus Altissimamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are complex and advanced systems for invasive species recording and distribution, including remote sensing (RS) [48], geographical information systems (GIS) [49][50][51][52], and geospatial technologies [53], but their application is expensive and reserved for the scientific community or highly skilled technicians, and are not of practical use at the local scale. Ailanthus altissima is mentioned among other invasive species to be tested for satellite remote sensing biodiversity evaluation [37], but the available parameters for imagery sources and classification techniques of remote sensing imagery related to vegetation mapping of this species are still in development.…”
Section: Harmfulnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field spectroscopy, after careful calibration of retrieval models, may provide such means to rapidly assess biochemical composition of leaves and vegetation canopies, thus augmenting sampling extent and/or spatial and temporal resolution (Asner & Martin, ; Feilhauer, Somers, & van der Linden, ; Serbin, Singh, McNeil, Kingdon, & Townsend, ). Nevertheless, despite the high potential of remote sensing to assess ecosystem functioning (Pettorelli et al., ; Schimel, Asner, & Moorcroft, ; Schneider et al., ) including impacts of invasive species (Asner, Jones, Martin, Knapp, & Hughes, ), there is still a research gap regarding trait‐based approaches that shed light on the mechanisms and processes of invasions (Niphadkar & Nagendra, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%