Triton X-100 solubilized chloroplast DNA but not nuclear DNA from a mixture of chloroplasts and nuclei. The buoyant density of chloroplast DNA was different from that of the satellite DNA in all of the species examined (Phaseolus coccioeus, Cucumis sadvus, Cucumis melo, Andrrhium majus, Vkia fabs, Oenotbers fruidcosa youligi). Chloroplast DNA constituted between 4.3% and 0.25% of the total leaf DNA in these species, and was present as 5 to 20 copies in each chloroplast.Many plant species have been shown to possess satellite DNAs, defined as minor components in CsCl gradients, which were considered to be nuclear in origin (5). Recently it was suggested that a major component of certain satellite DNAs was organellar (3,7). This implied that the method commonly used for nuclear DNA preparation, the selective solubilization of organelles by treatment with Triton X-100 (10), was ineffective, and that chloroplast DNA constituted a much greater proportion of the total DNA than was previously supposed (11). Bottomley (2), on the basis of chloroplast RNA polymerase distribution and electron microscopy studies, has also suggested that Triton X-100 did not fully solubilize the chloroplast structure.We have investigated the effect of Triton X-100 on partially purified chloroplast preparations. The DNA rendered soluble by the detergent and the DNA remaining in the pellet were analyzed in a model E analytical ultracentrifuge. This method was also used, together with measurements of Chl yield, to determine the amount of chloroplast DNA, as a percentage of total DNA. mM HEPES (pH 7.5). This was then centrifuged at 1,000g for 10 to 15 min, until the intact chloroplasts banded at the interface between the two sucrose concentrations. The chloroplast region was removed and the chloroplasts were recovered by diluting the sucrose and centrifugation at 1,500g for 10 min. A suspension of these chloroplasts was treated with Triton X-100 (BDH Chem. Ltd.) at 2% (v/v) final concentration and centrifuged at 1,500g for 10 min. DNA was prepared from the post-Triton X-100 supernatant by the addition of an equal volume of double strength detergent mix, from the post-Triton X-100 pellet by suspension in detergent mix, and from leaf tissue by homogenization in detergent mix, as previously described (12). DNAs were analyzed on CsCl gradients in a Beckman model E analytical ultracentrifuge (12) with Micrococcus lysodeikticus (M. luteus) DNA, buoyant density 1.731 g cm-3, included as a marker.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThe proportion of chloroplast DNA in a total DNA preparation was estimated by relating the amount of chloroplast DNA to Chl in the chloroplast preparation, and the total DNA to Chl in leaf tissue, assuming that the method of chloroplast preparation and purification produced chloroplasts with average Chl content. The Chl content of the pre-Triton X-100 chloroplast preparation and leaf tissue was determined from the A at 665 nm of an 80%o acetone extract. The total DNA of leaf tissue was determined by diphenylamine assay (4) on the t...