2017
DOI: 10.1075/thr.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satire, humor and the construction of identities

Abstract: Satire, Humor and the Construction of Identities conveys how satire can contribute to the construction of social subjects’ identities. It attempts to provide a theoretical ground for a novel understanding of the relationship between satire and identity by finding their common denominator, namely opposition, in order to explain the mechanism through which satire can form identities. After establishing the role of opposition in satire and identity construction through a detailed analysis of various theories, it … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically, the ambassador reflected Billig's argument that the identities of nation-states do not exist in isolation but in relation to "a complex of other nation-states" (Billig 1995: 14, 71). This relational identity involving an 'us' versus a 'them' has been discussed in relation to humour (Zekavat 2017) as well as to the Americanisation of France (Kuisel 1993) and of Australia (White 1981).…”
Section: Anglo-american Conceptual Developments and Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, the ambassador reflected Billig's argument that the identities of nation-states do not exist in isolation but in relation to "a complex of other nation-states" (Billig 1995: 14, 71). This relational identity involving an 'us' versus a 'them' has been discussed in relation to humour (Zekavat 2017) as well as to the Americanisation of France (Kuisel 1993) and of Australia (White 1981).…”
Section: Anglo-american Conceptual Developments and Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal consequences of humor in conversation are those that the speaker can achieve directly by employing hilarious passages or texts in his or her speech ( Attardo, 2017). In the same light, according to Zekavat (2017), the functions of humor in the communicative process can be grouped into four classes: social management, decommitment, mediation and functionalization.…”
Section: Functions Of Humormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptualisations of power relations that encompass circulatory rather than top-down flows, and in which institutions, subjects, discourse, and power-knowledge each play a role, can demystify the political implications of humorous intervention. Humour, then, should be understood not only as a weapon of the weak or the strong but as a relational modality implicated in discourse and power, one through which agents and audiences alike can form and manifest oppositional identities (see Bakhtin 2010aBakhtin , 2010bFoucault 1970Foucault , 1984Foucault , 2019Wilson 2011;Krys et al 2017;Zekavat 2017).…”
Section: Political Humour Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%