Satisfaction des soins obstétricaux : élaboration et validation d’une échelle de mesure de la qualité des soins

Ramanah, R.; Dumont, Alexandre; Schepens, Florent; Traore, Mariam; Marème, Gaye, Adji; Schaal, J.-P.; Riethmuller, Didier; Rude, Nathalie

doi:10.1016/j.gyobfe.2014.05.002

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These two scales need further evaluation of their psychometric properties.Women’s Perception of Control during Childbirth/PCCB [48]Oweis (2009)JordanNo aim/purpose of the instrument documented.See above.The Childbirth Schema Scale/CSS [33]Peirce (1994)USTo obtain an understanding of schema formation and revision with the known stressor of childbirth.Developed to gain understanding of the underlying structure of known stressors of childbirth, by comparing the schemas before and after birth [33]. Further development and adaptation of the instrument would strengthen the psychometric properties.Satisfaction with obstetrical care/SSO [49]Ramanah (2014)FranceCanadaSenegalTo measure satisfaction in obstetrical care during labor, delivery and two hours postpartum relevant to the French-speaking context.This instrument is tested in a French speaking context in Senegal, France and Canada [49]. Further development and evaluation of this instrument would strengthen the validity.The Preterm Birth Experience and Satisfaction Scale/P-BESS [50]Sawyer (2014)UKTo assess parents (women and their partners) experiences and satisfaction with care during very preterm birth (<32 gestational weeks).Further testing of psychometric properties in larger sample groups would be recommended as well as assessment of when the most suitable time after birth to administer the questionnaire would be [50].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring women’s childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments

Nilvér

Begley

Berg

2017

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

147

137

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundWomen’s childbirth experience can have immediate as well as long-term positive or negative effects on their life, well-being and health. When evaluating and drawing conclusions from research results, women’s experiences of childbirth should be one aspect to consider. Researchers and clinicians need help in finding and selecting the most suitable instrument for their purpose. The aim of this study was therefore to systematically identify and present validated instruments measuring women’s childbirth experience.MethodsA systematic review was conducted in January 2016 with a comprehensive search in the bibliographic databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, The Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Included instruments measured women’s childbirth experiences. Papers were assessed independently by two reviewers for inclusion, and quality assessment of included instruments was made by two reviewers independently and in pairs using Terwee et al’s criteria for evaluation of psychometric properties.ResultsIn total 5189 citations were screened, of which 5106 were excluded by title and abstract. Eighty-three full-text papers were reviewed, and 37 papers were excluded, resulting in 46 included papers representing 36 instruments. These instruments demonstrated a wide range in purpose and content as well as in the quality of psychometric properties.ConclusionsThis systematic review provides an overview of existing instruments measuring women’s childbirth experiences and can support researchers to identify appropriate instruments to be used, and maybe adapted, in their specific contexts and research purpose.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring women’s childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments

Nilvér

Begley

Berg

2017

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

147

137

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many researchers believe that the perceptions of the users of health services must be taken into account for true progress to occur [ 2 , 3 ]. In anthropological publications, the “perceived quality” of care is defined as a subjective and cognitive evaluation of the various dimensions that come into play when care is provided [ 4 ]. Certain characteristics have been shown to contribute to improvements in the perceived quality of care: the skill of the nursing staff [ [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] ], positive interactions with staff [ [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] ], the availability of material (15), infrastructure [ 16 ], drugs [ 12 , 17 , 18 ], and pain treatment and management [ 17 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%