2007
DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.44.1.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satisfaction Strength and Customer Loyalty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
215
1
12

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
17
215
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings are similar and support Cronin and Taylor's (1992) findings and more recently Chandrashekaran et al (2007) in the long-standing belief that an improvement in the quality of a service encounter leads to an increase in satisfaction, which in turn leads directly to favourable outcomes and thus increased loyalty. This study provides evidence of the direct effect of service quality and satisfaction on repatronage intention as suggested by the literature with satisfaction emerging as a stronger predictor of repatronage intentions in a low cost setting.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The findings are similar and support Cronin and Taylor's (1992) findings and more recently Chandrashekaran et al (2007) in the long-standing belief that an improvement in the quality of a service encounter leads to an increase in satisfaction, which in turn leads directly to favourable outcomes and thus increased loyalty. This study provides evidence of the direct effect of service quality and satisfaction on repatronage intention as suggested by the literature with satisfaction emerging as a stronger predictor of repatronage intentions in a low cost setting.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…To interpret the results in table 4, we used an approach that is used extensively in the management literature to explain results of moderation (Ranaweera and Rrabhu, 2003;Aydin et al, 2005;Fedon et al, 2006;Chandrashekaran et al, 2007) (table 6). However, in a closer look at the results, it becomes clear that this support is only partial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Study 6, we focus on two key behavioral outcomes-customer satisfaction and loyalty (Chandrashekaran et al 2007;Oliver 1993). On the basis of prior consumer research, we expect that brand experience affects these behavioral outcomes through a direct and indirect route (Chaiken, Liberman, and Eagly 1989;Petty and Cacioppo 1986).…”
Section: Study 6: Using Brand Experience To Predict Consumer Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%