DOI: 10.11606/d.22.2014.tde-10022015-192024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satisfaction With Appearance Scale - SWAP: adaptação e validação para brasileiros que sofreram queimaduras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment regarding satisfaction with body image occurred through the instrument Satisfaction With Appearance Scale (SWAP), composed by 14 sentences that can measure three elements of body image: social impact and discomfort (items one, two, three, 12, 13 and 14); subjective satisfaction of appearance with an emphasis on the characteristics of the upper parts of the body (items five, six, seven and 11) and the subjective satisfaction of appearance with an emphasis on upper and lower limbs of the body (items four, eight, nine and ten). 8 The responses varied on a scale of one through seven points for each item; thus, the instrument has as equivalent response and score: totally disagree=1; disagree=2; partially disagree=3; neutral=4; partially agree=5; agree=6 and completely agree=7. After obtaining the data, a point was subtracted from each item to fix items from zero to six, the values from four to 11 were inverted and, finally, they were all were summed, with the result varying from zero to 84 points, and, the closer to the maximum, the greater dissatisfaction with body image.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment regarding satisfaction with body image occurred through the instrument Satisfaction With Appearance Scale (SWAP), composed by 14 sentences that can measure three elements of body image: social impact and discomfort (items one, two, three, 12, 13 and 14); subjective satisfaction of appearance with an emphasis on the characteristics of the upper parts of the body (items five, six, seven and 11) and the subjective satisfaction of appearance with an emphasis on upper and lower limbs of the body (items four, eight, nine and ten). 8 The responses varied on a scale of one through seven points for each item; thus, the instrument has as equivalent response and score: totally disagree=1; disagree=2; partially disagree=3; neutral=4; partially agree=5; agree=6 and completely agree=7. After obtaining the data, a point was subtracted from each item to fix items from zero to six, the values from four to 11 were inverted and, finally, they were all were summed, with the result varying from zero to 84 points, and, the closer to the maximum, the greater dissatisfaction with body image.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este efeito não representa bons resultados para a validade de conteúdo, fidedignidade e responsividade, pois comprometem a distinção de respostas entre os sujeitos e a captação de mudanças entre os momentos de medida (TERWEE et al, 2007). No entanto, estudos de validação de instrumentos internacionais para o uso no Brasil com frequência reportam a ocorrência de efeitos floor e ceeling (CALTRAN, 2014). Há vários fatores que podem comprometer a aplicação de instrumentos nos estudos clínicos e que podem resultar nas respostas de extremos das escalas de avaliação.…”
Section: Proteção Dos Participantes Do Estudounclassified
“…Para esta análise foi utilizado o modelo proposto pelo grupo DISABKIDS® (DEON et al, 2011), que é com frequência empregado para a análise semântica de instrumentos traduzidos e adaptados para uso no Brasil, por ser um instrumento completo, capaz de avaliar aspectos gerais e específicos das escalas avaliadas quanto a compreensão e interpretação da escala(CALTRAN, 2014;FEGADOLLI, et al, 2010;PELEGRINO et al , 2012;SANTOS, et al, 2013). A utilização do modelo de análise semântica do DISABKIDS ® foi autorizada por representante do grupo no Brasil (ANEXO B) Neste modelo há duas modalidades de avaliação: uma análise geral do instrumento e uma análise específica dos itens que o compõem.…”
unclassified