1973
DOI: 10.1021/je60057a006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

saturated liquid molar volumes. Rackett equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
80
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, the calculation programs used to verify the point-to-point test were prepared considering the Fortran program of Fredenslund et al [2], that [16] procedure and a modification [22,23] of the Rackett equation [24] (HR), and also the procedure of Tsonopoulos [21] (with k ij = 0.05 as mixing parameter) and the routines of Yen-Woods [17] (TY) or Rackket modified [22][23][24] (TR). The mentioned calculation programs have been previously applied in different systems [12][13][14], and no significant differences have been found between them, irrespective of the different operating pressures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the calculation programs used to verify the point-to-point test were prepared considering the Fortran program of Fredenslund et al [2], that [16] procedure and a modification [22,23] of the Rackett equation [24] (HR), and also the procedure of Tsonopoulos [21] (with k ij = 0.05 as mixing parameter) and the routines of Yen-Woods [17] (TY) or Rackket modified [22][23][24] (TR). The mentioned calculation programs have been previously applied in different systems [12][13][14], and no significant differences have been found between them, irrespective of the different operating pressures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 A 1% error in density and hence susceptibility would lead to a 0.03 ppm error at temperatures far from the standard 25°C. However, for compounds that are not highly polar (such as acetone, chloroform, DMSO and tetrahydrofuran (THF)) the average error is 0.2 26 to 0.3%, 27 which would lead to a chemical shift error of 0.006 to 0.009 ppm at extreme temperatures. For D 2 O, the Kell equation 11 was used instead of the Rackett equation 10 to improve accuracy.…”
Section: Estimation Of Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This deficiency was already stated by Poling et al [12] for substances with a compressibility factor Z c < 0.22, but it is observed also for biphenyl (Z c = 0.261) and for diphenyl ether (Z c = 0.255). As the critical densities for both biphenyl and diphenyl ether are available with a reasonable accuracy, better accuracy for the estimation of the saturated liquid densities can be attained by using the modified Racket equation of Yamada and Gunn [52], as recommended in Ref. [12].…”
Section: Experimental Saturated Liquid Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%