2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45319-9_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saturation: An Efficient Iteration Strategy for Symbolic State—Space Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
122
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
122
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows runtimes and total memory requirements using W workstations for sequential S m A r T (SEQ) [11] and the original S m A r T N ow (DISTR) [5], and the percentage change w.r.t. DISTR for the naïve (NAÏVE), the history-based (HIST) [6] and the pattern-length-adjusted (LENGTH) or weighted-score-adjusted (SCORE) speculative firing predictions [7]; 'd'means that dynamic memory load balancing is triggered and 's' means that, in addition, memory swapping occurs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 shows runtimes and total memory requirements using W workstations for sequential S m A r T (SEQ) [11] and the original S m A r T N ow (DISTR) [5], and the percentage change w.r.t. DISTR for the naïve (NAÏVE), the history-based (HIST) [6] and the pattern-length-adjusted (LENGTH) or weighted-score-adjusted (SCORE) speculative firing predictions [7]; 'd'means that dynamic memory load balancing is triggered and 's' means that, in addition, memory swapping occurs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results in [11][12][13] consistently show that Saturation outperforms breadth-first symbolic state-space generation by several orders of magnitude in both memory and time, making it arguably the most efficient state-space generation algorithm for globally asynchronous locally synchronous discrete event systems. Thus, it makes sense to attempt its parallelization, while parallelizing the less efficient breadth-first approach would not offset the enormous speedups and memory reductions of Saturation.…”
Section: Saturation-based Fixpoint Iteration Strategymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also compared our approach to the well-known saturation-based model checking algorithm [2], [14]. The results can be seen in Table 1, where TO refers to an unacceptable run-time (> 600 seconds), ERR means a run-time exception and NS implies that the algorithm terminated, but could not solve the problem.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Tools and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%