2014
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2013.2297572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAVERS: A Simulator of GNSS Reflections From Bare and Vegetated Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several theoretical studies have shown that the elevation angle has an influence on the bistatic signal penetration down to the soil and the retrieval of vegetation parameters [33,34]. For this reason, our statistical analysis of the GNSS-R measurements makes use of two elevation intervals (50-70 • and 70-90 • ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several theoretical studies have shown that the elevation angle has an influence on the bistatic signal penetration down to the soil and the retrieval of vegetation parameters [33,34]. For this reason, our statistical analysis of the GNSS-R measurements makes use of two elevation intervals (50-70 • and 70-90 • ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic errors may also change slowly with time; e.g. the impact of signal multipath at a GNSS site may vary due to growing vegetation (Pierdicca et al, 2014).…”
Section: T Ning Et Al: the Uncertainty Of The Gnss-derived Iwvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardware changes and the difference in measurements usually result in a constant offset (Johansson 1998), while the inconsistences due to the latter change are normally varying when reflective properties change. For example, a bias due to growing vegetation changes continuously for a certain time period (Pierdicca et al 2014), while the cutting of trees and/or different soil moisture (i.e., rain and snow) introduce a sudden bias (Larson et al 2010). Signal multipath effects are worse for observations at low elevation angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%