2008
DOI: 10.1109/mias.2008.929351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saving energy using flywheels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fuel consumption was reduced by 21%, emissions of nitrous oxides by 26% and particulate emissions by 67%. It is also worth noticing that the number of cycles, 100,000-200,000 per year, would be hard to achieve with batteries, since their lifetime would be severely compromised [66,67].…”
Section: Container Cranes/straddle Carriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fuel consumption was reduced by 21%, emissions of nitrous oxides by 26% and particulate emissions by 67%. It is also worth noticing that the number of cycles, 100,000-200,000 per year, would be hard to achieve with batteries, since their lifetime would be severely compromised [66,67].…”
Section: Container Cranes/straddle Carriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to increase the energy savings in electrified or diesel RTG crane systems, ESSs have been used for peak shaving during the lifting period by using recovered potential energy that has accrued during the lowering period and avoid dissipating energy through the dump resistors as heat [1,[6][7][8][9][10][11]. In the literature, ESS control algorithms on an RTG crane system, which can be either a diesel or electrified crane, mainly focus on using conventional control strategies that use a reference value (set-point control) of power [1,9], SoC [7] or voltage [3,11] to store recovered potential energy and regenerate it during the lifting phase which helps to increase energy savings and reduce gas emissions. Table 1 summarises the peak reduction algorithms used in an RTG crane model produced by different authors along with their achievements and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the energy consumption comes from hoisting containers (weighing up to 54 tons) for a typical full height of 15 m at vertical speeds that can reach 0.85 m/s, resulting in short intense loads of limited durations. In order to reduce the stress on the primary source, which can be either a diesel generator or the port's electrical network, energy storage can be used for peak shaving during the lifting phase and to recover potential energy during the lowering phase [12][13][14]. Although other authors proposed RTG cranes equipped with batteries [13], these are best suited for reducing idle power consumption due to their low power density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other authors proposed RTG cranes equipped with batteries [13], these are best suited for reducing idle power consumption due to their low power density. Flywheels and supercapacitors are more suited for the high power flows deriving from the hoist motor (both when motoring and generating), and they have been the subject of multiple studies [12,[14][15][16][17]. Flywheel energy storage systems (FESSs) in particular have been found particularly suited for this task, as they show similar performance to supercapacitors, while being characterised by excellent ageing characteristics, which are independent of the charge rate or depth of discharge [1,18], allowing their lifetime to match that of the portal frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%