2019
DOI: 10.1177/1781685819881372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saving face and facing climate change: Are border adjustments a viable option to stop carbon leakage?

Abstract: This article argues that imposing a carbon tariff on imports from the EU’s trading partners could deliver tangible climate results but would also provoke strong trade repercussions. Ideally, the implementation of the Paris Agreement remains the best solution for the planet. But ambitious domestic climate policy in the absence of an international commitment to reduce carbon emissions puts the EU at a competitive disadvantage. While continuing its leadership on climate action, the EU has addressed the threat of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowledge of this challenge appears to be rising in academia and policy-making (Wiedmann et al 2020;O'Neill et al 2018). Green economy and sustainable consumption advocates in many high-income countries are thus shifting their focus towards global en- vironmental impacts of national economic activity (Palacková 2019). However, ambitious and thus costly policy action to mitigate international environmental impact shifting and achieve globally sustainable levels of local consumption eventually requires that consumers and citizens care equally about environmental impacts of their consumption both at home and abroad (Barnett et al 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Arguments and Expected Empirical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of this challenge appears to be rising in academia and policy-making (Wiedmann et al 2020;O'Neill et al 2018). Green economy and sustainable consumption advocates in many high-income countries are thus shifting their focus towards global en- vironmental impacts of national economic activity (Palacková 2019). However, ambitious and thus costly policy action to mitigate international environmental impact shifting and achieve globally sustainable levels of local consumption eventually requires that consumers and citizens care equally about environmental impacts of their consumption both at home and abroad (Barnett et al 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Arguments and Expected Empirical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the data on carbon emissions becomes merged with international trade law, optimistic reduction effects could be realized [33,34]. Furthermore, regulations on export subsidies and Emission Trading System (ETS) free allowance allocations must be included to fully realize the effect of the carbon border tax [33,35]. At the WTO Committee on Trade and Environment (CTE) meeting in March 2021, the lack of transparency in the CBAM and how it could potentially distort trade were pointed out [3].…”
Section: Limitations Of the Cbammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one of the EU's core policy tools to address climate change, the EU CBAM has become a hot topic in academia recently. Carbon tariffs on imports from EU trading partners might bring tangible results in avoiding carbon leakage, as well as a significant impact on trade [8,18,19]. By simulating changes in the overall exports of EU member states and non-EU member states to the EU, Zhong and Pei [11] found that after the implementation of the EU CBAM, output in the EU would increase by 0.38%, while output in the rest of the world would decrease by 0.1%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%