2020
DOI: 10.2337/dc20-1176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saving the Diabetic Foot During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Tale of Two Cities

Abstract: Of all the late complications of diabetes, those involving the foot have traditionally required more face-to-face patient visits to clinics to treat wounds by debridement, offloading, and many other treatment modalities. The advent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted not only in the closing of most outpatient clinics for face-to-face consultations but also in the inability to perform most laboratory and imaging investigations. This has resulted in a paradigm shift in the delivery o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
104
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
104
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that, with advances made in home-based monitoring and telehealth in the peripandemic period, significant improvements in detection and reporting may be possible. 34–36 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We believe that, with advances made in home-based monitoring and telehealth in the peripandemic period, significant improvements in detection and reporting may be possible. 34–36 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that, with advances made in home-based monitoring and telehealth in the peripandemic period, significant improvements in detection and reporting may be possible. [34][35][36] If true, our findings would also have important potential implications for the analysis and interpretation of data from studies with diabetic foot recurrence as an outcome. The results suggest that identification of a plantar DFU by investigators during a trial may not be a good indication of when the DFU actually occurred due to delays in identification until routine or scheduled exams.…”
Section: Pathophysiology/complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median time courses of delivery of care were 85 (interquartile range 66-131) days in group A and 64 (43-108) days in group B (P 5 0.024). When the time frame was stratified, there were significant differences between groups regarding the median intervals from patient-reported DFU onset to their medical visits (75 [49-120] days vs. 45 [30-90] days, P 5 0.001) and from outpatient assessment to hospital admission (3 [2][3][4][5] days vs. 7 [5][6][7][8][9][10] days, P , 0.001). However, the durations of inpatient care were homogenous (10 [6-14] days vs. 9 [7-18] days, P 5 0.584).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They report an increased risk of amputation and attribute it to impaired access to providers. A Perspective in a previous issue of Diabetes Care proposed that this problem might be avoided by active decentralization of care (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%