1998
DOI: 10.1139/b98-179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saxifragaceae of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: a contribution to a DELTA database for interactive identification and illustrated information retrieval

Abstract: A re-assessment of members of the family Saxifragaceae in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago is presented as a traditional key and annotated checklist that recognizes 17 taxa. The information on which this paper is based is recorded in a developing DELTA database that aims to collect the following data: place of valid publication; synonymy, usually limited to names that have been associated with the Canadian Arctic; common name(s), if applicable; vegetative and floral morphological characters; data on the distrib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
380
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
380
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study area, the species was very abundant adjacent to the colony (where it constituted more than half of the total plant cover), almost completely predominated at 15-45 m from the colony, and then decreased towards the coast. Leaf width of specimens found along the study transect covered the full range of this plant's leaf size described for Svalbard (Rønning 1996) and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (Aiken et al 2007). Along this gradient, from the colony to the sea, C. groenlandica leaf size diminished almost tenfold and individual biomass decreased by around two orders of magnitude N number of samples * P \ 0.05, *** P \ 0.001, ns non-significant (P [ 0.05) (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our study area, the species was very abundant adjacent to the colony (where it constituted more than half of the total plant cover), almost completely predominated at 15-45 m from the colony, and then decreased towards the coast. Leaf width of specimens found along the study transect covered the full range of this plant's leaf size described for Svalbard (Rønning 1996) and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (Aiken et al 2007). Along this gradient, from the colony to the sea, C. groenlandica leaf size diminished almost tenfold and individual biomass decreased by around two orders of magnitude N number of samples * P \ 0.05, *** P \ 0.001, ns non-significant (P [ 0.05) (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…What is more, lower water content and better aeration of soil close to the colony might promote more intensive nitrification and thus further loss of ammonium (Lindeboom 1984;Staunton Smith and Johnson 1995;Ligeza and Smal 2003). Notably, while C. groenlandica is recognised to be a plant that is characteristic of wetter habitats (Aiken et al 2007), in the current study its individual biomass and leaf size strongly decreased with higher soil water content, i.e., down the slope (however, a part of the water might be enclosed in bulk undecomposed plant material which means unavailable for C. groenlandica there). This observation indicates that nutrient availability was much more limiting for its growth than water content in this location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(panicle with long branches) and f. interrupta Prahl (panicle branches very short and panicle interrupted) without, however, giving actual numerical values. According to many authors (Matuszkiewicz 1948;Falkowski 1982;Szafer et al 1988;Conert 1989;Hubbard 1968;Cracles 1994;Aiken et al 1999;Marr et al 2007) who describe the variation of C. stricta s. stricto, its height is nearly always delimited up to 100 cm, length of panicle up to 15 cm, seldom up to 20 cm, and length of basal lateral branches of panicle up to 4 cm. However, the height of 53% of individuals of C. stricta collected in Zbijów Ma³y is greater than 100 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%