2021
DOI: 10.37718/csa.2008.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Say it in Iron. Symbols of Transformation and Reproduction in the European Iron Age

Abstract: The European research on iron has traditionally focused on the technical and economic aspects of iron production, However, a view of metal working in a wider regional context shows that it is generally entrenched in symbolic meaning and ritual activity. In this paper, the author employs four ethnographic case studies to show the importance of symbolic and ritual aspects of iron working and how these are intertwined with technological factors. What comes across are also the metaphorical links between pottery ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it depends on their sociocultural context, metalworking can provide prestige and power in many different ways (Reid & MacLean 1995, 145), by providing symbols (Sassoon 1983), as esoteric and exclusive knowledge (Barndon 2004, 41; Childs 1998, 112), or through the value retained by certain objects (Hingley 2009). However, this relationship between metallurgy and power is usually only explored through the symbolism of iron production (Green 2002, 8; Haaland 2007–8, 203), leaving aside the production of other objects. It is true that, as we will see below, iron production has a symbolic relevance that, in certain conditions, favours a particular cosmogony.…”
Section: Metallurgy As An Agent Of Social Change? (Sixth–fourth Centu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it depends on their sociocultural context, metalworking can provide prestige and power in many different ways (Reid & MacLean 1995, 145), by providing symbols (Sassoon 1983), as esoteric and exclusive knowledge (Barndon 2004, 41; Childs 1998, 112), or through the value retained by certain objects (Hingley 2009). However, this relationship between metallurgy and power is usually only explored through the symbolism of iron production (Green 2002, 8; Haaland 2007–8, 203), leaving aside the production of other objects. It is true that, as we will see below, iron production has a symbolic relevance that, in certain conditions, favours a particular cosmogony.…”
Section: Metallurgy As An Agent Of Social Change? (Sixth–fourth Centu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, commonly used in different anthropological studies (especially in Africa: e.g. Barndon 2004; Childs 1998; Herbert 1993; Schmidt & Mapunda 1997), has not been particularly exploited in archaeological studies of European protohistory, with some exceptions in regions such as the British Isles (Dolan 2016; Giles 2007; Hingley 1997; 2009) or Scandinavia (Barndon 2006; Gansum 2004; Haaland 2004; 2007–8).…”
Section: Introduction: a Different Approach To Metalworkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the second, and with some regional exceptions (e.g. Hingley 1997; 2009; Haaland 2007–08), metallurgy has usually been studied from a technological perspective, as is also the case in north‐west Iberia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%