2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The systematic literature review employs a specific methodology to locate research to select and evaluate the contributions made by each study and analyze and synthesize the data [23]. For Denyer and Tranfield [16], it consists of a specific methodology that locates existing studies, selects and evaluates contributions, analyzes and synthesizes data and reports the evidence in such a way that allows reasonably clear conclusions about what is and what is not is known.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic literature review employs a specific methodology to locate research to select and evaluate the contributions made by each study and analyze and synthesize the data [23]. For Denyer and Tranfield [16], it consists of a specific methodology that locates existing studies, selects and evaluates contributions, analyzes and synthesizes data and reports the evidence in such a way that allows reasonably clear conclusions about what is and what is not is known.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the evidence remains inconclusive, most SOP-related literature establishes that SOP promotes more aligned compensation designs (Lozano-Reina and Sánchez-Marín, 2020). Correa and Lel (2016), who carry out a prominent cross-country study, point out that in countries where SOP has been adopted it seems to have proven effective since its implementation, and has led to an overall improvement in executive compensation compared to countries that have not adopted it.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferri and Maber (2013) point out that boards tend to remove controversial pay practices when high SOP dissent is received at the general meeting, and Burns and Minnick (2013) evidence that boards modify the pay mix after implementing SOP, tending toward designs that are more in line with company interests. This voting not only stands out for the effect of high dissent on subsequent pay designs but also for the persuasive effect that SOP-related legislation has on boards and compensation committees, which might even improve the linkage between compensation and shareholders' interests before voting takes place (Lozano-Reina and Sánchez-Marín, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations