Treatment termination is, arguably, one of the most important events in the course of psychotherapy. In the present article, we present an approach to termination that views the latter as a key intervention. Developed from an integrated, cognitive-existential psychodynamics (CEP) perspective (Shahar & Govrin, 2017), Using Termination as an Intervention (UTAI) is a prescheduled, albeit tentative, treatment termination that may be used as an intervention for patients' remoralization (Howard, Kopta, Krause, & Orlinsky, 1986). Specifically, for some psychotherapy patients, prescheduling a treatment termination is useful in instilling a sense of responsibility and agency and in deepening a therapeutic examination of patients' interpersonal schemas and scripts (i.e., "object relations"). The integrative nature of Using Termination as an Intervention is delineated, and caveats are discussed.
Clinical Impact StatementQuestion: How should treatment with highly demoralized, often treatment-resistant, patients coming to therapy be terminated? Findings: Drawing from Using Termination as an Intervention, clinicians may inquire about the smallest therapeutic achievement that would still render-according to the patient-worthwhile and set a deadline for attaining this goal, and then-tentatively-terminate. Meaning: Tentatively prescheduling a termination date that is tied to what the patient deems as the smallest, but still worthwhile, therapeutic gain may bolster remoralization, instill a sense of agency, and-paradoxically-encourage continuation. Next Steps: We aim at testing Using Termination as an Intervention in the context of a randomized clinical trial, to identify patient characteristics that render it either counter indicated or particularly pertinent for some patients.