2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sb2(S, Se)3-based photovoltaic cell with MoS2 as a hole transport layer: a numerical investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 6,19 ] And noticeably, our systematic simulation study also proved that the annealed MnS‐HTL enhances not only the narrow bandgap Sb 2 (S,Se) 3 devices but also the wider bandgap Sb 2 (S,Se) 3 devices, which is not reported, so far (see Table 2). Previously reported simulated device performances, for example, Mamta et al (25.6% [ 33 ] ), Ayala‐Mato et al (18.43% [ 9 ] ), and Gharibshahian et al (15.65% [ 39 ] ) are higher than the current device PCE. The main reason for this difference is the choice of different ETL/HTL layers, device configurations, and various physical input parameters, for example, thickness range (absorber = 2 μm [ 39 ] and HTL = 2 μm [ 33 ] ), thus generate higher J sc (over 32 mA cm −2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[ 6,19 ] And noticeably, our systematic simulation study also proved that the annealed MnS‐HTL enhances not only the narrow bandgap Sb 2 (S,Se) 3 devices but also the wider bandgap Sb 2 (S,Se) 3 devices, which is not reported, so far (see Table 2). Previously reported simulated device performances, for example, Mamta et al (25.6% [ 33 ] ), Ayala‐Mato et al (18.43% [ 9 ] ), and Gharibshahian et al (15.65% [ 39 ] ) are higher than the current device PCE. The main reason for this difference is the choice of different ETL/HTL layers, device configurations, and various physical input parameters, for example, thickness range (absorber = 2 μm [ 39 ] and HTL = 2 μm [ 33 ] ), thus generate higher J sc (over 32 mA cm −2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[16] ITO/CdS/Sb 2 (S,Se) Sim. [33] FTO/CdS/Sb 2 (S,Se) 3 /PbS NP/carbon 18.80 0.650 65.06 8.0 Exp. [44] FTO/TiO 2 /Sb 2 (S,Se) 3 /Spiro-OMeTAD/Au 21.10 0.520 52.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations