2002
DOI: 10.1002/1616-5195(20020201)2:2<67::aid-mabi67>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaffold Design for Tissue Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
231
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 582 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
231
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Porous 3D scaffolds have been used extensively for skin tissue engineering [16]. Ideal scaffolds should have high cell seeding efficiency, promote fast cell attachment to the scaffolds and facilitate uniform spatial distribution of cells and extracellular matrix throughout the scaffolds [17]. It has been reported that a homogeneous spatial distribution of cells influences cell density in the engineered tissue constructs, which in turn impacts the kinetics of cell proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition and affects the functionality of engineered tissue [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…Porous 3D scaffolds have been used extensively for skin tissue engineering [16]. Ideal scaffolds should have high cell seeding efficiency, promote fast cell attachment to the scaffolds and facilitate uniform spatial distribution of cells and extracellular matrix throughout the scaffolds [17]. It has been reported that a homogeneous spatial distribution of cells influences cell density in the engineered tissue constructs, which in turn impacts the kinetics of cell proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition and affects the functionality of engineered tissue [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…Moreover, for tissue engineering, previous studies have demonstrated that high mechanical strength is important for biodegradable polymer scaffolds (Hoerstrup et al, 2000;Shinoka et al, 1995;Shinoka et al, 1998;Stock et al, 2000) or allogenic acellular matrix scaffolds (Steinhoff et al, 2000). Major disadvantages of biodegradable polymer scaffolds include the requirement of reconstruction of the natural three-dimensional structures, and the absence of important ECM proteins in the synthetic polymers (Cheresh et al, 1989;Joshi et al, 1993). Thus, acellularized xenogenic tissues which maintain natural 3-dimensional structures are a promising alternative to biodegradable polymer scaffolds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 41%
“…Pore size, pore number, and surface area are widely recognized as important parameters for scaffolds used in tissue engineering. Other architectural features such as pore shape and pore wall morphology of the scaffold material have also been suggested as important for cell seeding, migration, growth, and new tissue formation in three dimensions (Chen et al, 2002;Yang et al, 2001). In choosing appropriate material as the scaffold for use in , and Feng-Huei Lin corneal tissue engineering, the effects of corneal cell proliferation and migration on the material need to be considered in advance (Orwin and Hubel, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…Different cell types were tested in TE protocols. To understand the importance of scaffolds, it is useful to consider studies that provide evidence of the ability of some biomaterial scaffolds to directly control stem cell differentiation (Chen et al 2002). In fact, the choice of appropriate scaffold is much more complex than the choice of cell type and depends on many factors.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 39%