2006
DOI: 10.1002/qsar.200610091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaffold‐Hopping: How Far Can You Jump?

Abstract: Finding new isofunctional chemotypes with the aim of identifying new lead candidates remains a challenging task in medicinal chemistry. Different virtual screening techniques have been shown to be useful for this scaffold-hopping process. We have compiled recent examples of scaffold-hops that were achieved by virtual screening. Most of these techniques rely on some sort of similarity estimation between known reference molecules and screening compounds, some include receptor-structure information and scoring of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pharmacophore descriptors typically focus on the relative position of pharmacophore groups in the molecule, not paying much attention to the manner in which these are interconnected -the pharmacophoric pairs, [32,33] triplets [34,35] and 4-point descriptors, [36] which enables them to perform successful "scaffold hopping" (discovery of new scaffolds porting the given pharmacophore pattern seen in known actives). [37][38][39] By contrast, the above-mentioned pharmacophore-coloured ECFPs are genuine fragment counts. Apparently, pharmacophore multiplets and fragment counts seem to be conceptually different -in fact, they can be unified within the concept of "fuzzy" fragments, in which the nature of terminal fragment atoms is always explicit, while the nature of the intermediate, interconnecting atoms may be optionally mentioned or ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Pharmacophore descriptors typically focus on the relative position of pharmacophore groups in the molecule, not paying much attention to the manner in which these are interconnected -the pharmacophoric pairs, [32,33] triplets [34,35] and 4-point descriptors, [36] which enables them to perform successful "scaffold hopping" (discovery of new scaffolds porting the given pharmacophore pattern seen in known actives). [37][38][39] By contrast, the above-mentioned pharmacophore-coloured ECFPs are genuine fragment counts. Apparently, pharmacophore multiplets and fragment counts seem to be conceptually different -in fact, they can be unified within the concept of "fuzzy" fragments, in which the nature of terminal fragment atoms is always explicit, while the nature of the intermediate, interconnecting atoms may be optionally mentioned or ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We also noted the numbers of distinct Murcko scaffolds in the active molecules that were retrieved, rather than just the number of active molecules. As recommended by Good et al [33], this was done to assess the effectiveness of the various weighting schemes for scaffold-hopping [41][42][43].…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final step of the CATS descriptor calculation is the scaling of the vector [57,58]. The CATS descriptor was successfully employed in earlier de novo design projects and had proven useful for the purpose of scaffold-hopping [49,59,60].…”
Section: Scoring a Virtual Molecule By Topological Pharmacophoresmentioning
confidence: 99%