2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-015-0713-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaffolding for mathematics teaching in inclusive primary classrooms: a video study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar program was successfully carried out with a German sample (Wißmann et al 2013) and the students in the intervention group had significantly greater learning gains compared to a control group. Pfister et al (2015aPfister et al ( , 2015b) conducted a study (involving two intervention groups and a control group) to examine how teachers and special education teachers implement a remedial mathematics program in a classroom setting, focusing on conceptual understanding (place value, meanings of operations), selected procedural skills (e.g., automation of number combinations, counting by steps), and adaptive teaching practices. A significant effect was found only for one of the intervention groups.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar program was successfully carried out with a German sample (Wißmann et al 2013) and the students in the intervention group had significantly greater learning gains compared to a control group. Pfister et al (2015aPfister et al ( , 2015b) conducted a study (involving two intervention groups and a control group) to examine how teachers and special education teachers implement a remedial mathematics program in a classroom setting, focusing on conceptual understanding (place value, meanings of operations), selected procedural skills (e.g., automation of number combinations, counting by steps), and adaptive teaching practices. A significant effect was found only for one of the intervention groups.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, focusing on terminology appeared to orient interventions toward identifying words that are meaningful for word problem-solving purposes, but often occurred at the expense of exploring a diversity of possible interpretations and the full range of logico-mathematical relationships at hand. Pfister et al (2015b) showed in their video-study in inclusive classrooms that guiding a classroom discourse and responding in a contextualised fashion to students' inputs is highly demanding. The same could be observed for handling errors productively.…”
Section: Teachers' Mathematical and Didactical Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some emphasize dialogue (Abdu et al, this issue;Bell & Pape, 2012, Kazak et al, 2015Kolikant & Broza, 2011), others teacher strategies (Makar et al, 2015;Pfister et al, 2015;Stender & Kaiser, 2015), teacher practices (Abdu et al, 2015), or the specific nature of computer tools (Chase & Abrahamson, 2015;Kazak et al, 2015). The key idea behind the aforementioned artefacts (solution plans etc.)…”
Section: How Does Scaffolding Take Place?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A teacher can provide instructional feedback by means of scaffolding within the zone of proximal development. This entails that a teacher supports a student in completing a task by, for instance, modeling it, providing explicit instruction, or providing visual representations (Pfister, Moser Opitz, & Pauli, 2015). This support is gradually released up until the point that the student can perform the task on his or her own (Wood, Bruner, & Ross, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%