2019
DOI: 10.1080/15235882.2019.1596179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaffolds, signs, and bridges: Language ideologies and translanguaging in student-teaching experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While stating a preference for using one language at a time instead of language “mixing” in French, he ironically leveraged his full semiotic repertoire to make meaning using the English word “fluent.” These practices demonstrated how translanguaging can accompany other multimodal elements in asynchronous video communication, as has been found for synchronous L2 video communication (Canals, 2021). However, while Canals characterized “translanguaging” and “multimodality” as distinct, we assert that the two practices are inseparable within an individual’s semiotic repertoire (Brown and Allmond, 2021; Wei, 2018), as multilingual learners “constantly translanguage and use their full linguistic repertoires to make meaning in the world” (Pacheco et al, 2019: 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…While stating a preference for using one language at a time instead of language “mixing” in French, he ironically leveraged his full semiotic repertoire to make meaning using the English word “fluent.” These practices demonstrated how translanguaging can accompany other multimodal elements in asynchronous video communication, as has been found for synchronous L2 video communication (Canals, 2021). However, while Canals characterized “translanguaging” and “multimodality” as distinct, we assert that the two practices are inseparable within an individual’s semiotic repertoire (Brown and Allmond, 2021; Wei, 2018), as multilingual learners “constantly translanguage and use their full linguistic repertoires to make meaning in the world” (Pacheco et al, 2019: 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As mentioned earlier, linguistic purism goes hand in hand with standardization discourse (Woolard, 1998) emphasizing the use of a distinct language and purifying it from any element that might deviate from the established norms. Students' conflicting language ideologies regarding the use of language mixing are similar to those of a participant in Pacheco et al (2019) study who conceived language mixing as a valuable resource for class participation; yet, she was uncertain about how to achieve the academic goal of using correct English. The students' metaphors captured their ideological tension about language mixing.…”
Section: Below Are Some Examplesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This decision was reinforced in other pedagogical approaches such as audiolingualism or the communicative approach (Cenoz and Gorter 2015;Duarte 2019;Larsen-Freeman 2000;Ramirez and Ross 2019;Zavala 2019). 3 Meanwhile, several local and international authorities in education have suggested that harnessing students' linguistic repertoire for instructional purposes has positive benefits in terms of improving academic performance in science (Barakos and Selleck 2019;Duarte 2019;Goossens 2019;Jang and Brutt-Griffler 2019;Kiramba and Smith 2019;Nehring 2019;Ollerhead 2019;Pacheco et al 2019;Paquet and Levasseur 2019;Preece 2019).…”
Section: Linguistic Landscapes and Challenges In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some modern scholars view translanguaging as a theory that postulates that rather than possessing multiple autonomous language systems, as has been traditionally thought (Pacheco et al 2019), all users of language conveniently select and use relevant linguistic features from a single communicative repertoire in the meaning-making process (Iversen 2020;Vogel and García 2017). Through translanguaging, multilingual science students use their idiolect, that is, their individual full linguistic repertoire, without regard for socially and politically defined language labels or boundaries (Cook and Li 2016;Hamman 2018;Nehring 2019).…”
Section: Science Education: Oscillation Between Everyday and Scientif...mentioning
confidence: 99%