1999
DOI: 10.1109/50.737422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalability of optical multiwavelength switching networks: crosstalk analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modularity of such OXNs can be classified according to the ease in which new fiber links (link modularity or L-Mod) or wavelengths (wavelength modularity or λ-Mod) can be added without sacrificing any existing OXN components [4]. Unfortunately, the increase in OXN size further accentuates the detrimental effects of module imperfections on the signals they handle [13]. Furthermore, there is an expected deterioration in node dependability (availability performance and its influencing factors) and increased running costs that limits the potential returns on the investment of added OXN components [34].…”
Section: Improved Modularitymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modularity of such OXNs can be classified according to the ease in which new fiber links (link modularity or L-Mod) or wavelengths (wavelength modularity or λ-Mod) can be added without sacrificing any existing OXN components [4]. Unfortunately, the increase in OXN size further accentuates the detrimental effects of module imperfections on the signals they handle [13]. Furthermore, there is an expected deterioration in node dependability (availability performance and its influencing factors) and increased running costs that limits the potential returns on the investment of added OXN components [34].…”
Section: Improved Modularitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3d) was proposed by Bilodeau et al [10], which pro- vides narrower passbands compared to plain FBGs, but has poor crosstalk isolation X = 20 dB for 100 GHz spacing). Alternative fiber interferometer filtering configurations, namely the Sagnac loops [11] or Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZI) [12] also fall short of the crosstalk isolation requirements (X ≥ 30 dB) for the current generation of dense WDM systems [13]. Kewitsch et al [14] propose an asymmetric or null coupling filter with an FBG inscribed on its waist as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: All-fiber (De)multiplexersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former, which falls within the signal wavelength slot as shown in Fig.1, cannot be simply eliminated by filtering and results in unacceptable signal degradation. Crosstalk analyses of OXCs presented so far are generally focused on conventional OXCs [2,3]. Tunable FBG based devices present a promising alternative [4,5], however, there has been no crosstalk modeling of this type of OXC in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coherent crosstalk with long timescale fluctuations compromises threshold setting in receivers. The resulting beat noise incurs large power penalties and bit error floors (Gillner et al, 1999). If the path length differences are minimised to less than one bit period and the wavelengths are stable, as might be anticipated in a monolithic multistage network, phase difference becomes invariant and less problematic (Dods et al, 1997).…”
Section: Crosstalkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-wavelength crosstalk has been studied across architectures. Many early switch architectures assumed one wavelength per switch element in multiwavelength fabrics, and this called for a multi-domain description of spatially-and spectrally-originating crosstalk (Gillner et al, 1999;Zhou et al, 1994;Zhou et al, 1996). Recent requirements for massive data capacities have led recent work to focus on multi-wavelength routing where interwavelength crosstalk can occur through cross gain modulation (Oberg & Olsson, 1988;Inoue, 1989;Summerfield & Tucker, 1999).…”
Section: Crosstalkmentioning
confidence: 99%