2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10619-008-7029-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable and topology-aware reconciliation on P2P networks

Abstract: International audienceCollaborative applications are characterized by high levels of data sharing. Optimistic replication has been suggested as a mechanism to enable highly concurrent access to the shared data, whilst providing full application-defined consistency guarantees. Nowadays, there are a growing number of emerging cooperative applications adequate for Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks. However, to enable the deployment of such applications in P2P networks, it is required a mechanism to deal with their high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with P2P [27,31], a major difference is that multisite cloud does not have as many sites. Another difference is that the security issue in multisite cloud is more important than in P2P, e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with P2P [27,31], a major difference is that multisite cloud does not have as many sites. Another difference is that the security issue in multisite cloud is more important than in P2P, e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with replication, there is the classical issue of maintaining consistency between replicas in case of content updates. In this paper, we do not discuss this issue, however good pointers can be found in our previous work [57,20].…”
Section: Insights Into Caching and Replicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize reconciliation time, such allocation should be dynamic, i.e., nodes should be allocated based on the reconciliation context (e.g., number of actions, number of replicas, network properties, etc.). We elaborated a cost model and the associated algorithms for allocating reconciler nodes based on communication costs [25,26]. These algorithms take into account cost changes due to dynamic disconnections and reconnections.…”
Section: Managing Dynamic Disconnections and Reconnectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%