Scalable fair multicast using active services

Kasera, Sneha Kumar; Bhattacharyya, Supratik; Keaton, M.; Zabele, S.; Kiwior, D.; Kurose, Jim; Towsley, Don

doi:10.1109/dance.2002.1003505

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These protocols are designed to work specifically with the IP environment and take advantage of the IP routing protocols such as routing information protocol (RIP) and open shortest path first (OSPF) protocol. They focus on issues related to reliability, scalability, and reduced communication overhead [10,6]. These protocols, however, do not address the QoS requirements of multimedia applications.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Delay-Constrained, Low-Cost Multicast Routing in Multimedia Networks

Alrabiah

Znati

2001

Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Delay-Constrained, Low-Cost Multicast Routing in Multimedia Networks

Alrabiah

Znati

2001

Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The scheme extends our previous work streamTFRC [4], which is an unicast TCP-Friendly congestion control for multimedia streaming using multiple time-scale prediction(briefly in III-A), to the multicast case. Furthermore, our scheme constructs a scalable overlay multicast congestion control architecture for QoS support combining scalable design methodologies [5] [6] for multicast congestion control and hop-byhop characteristics [7] [8] in overlay network. In the remaining part of this section, we will firstly discuss about Over-layTFMRC architecture in brief.…”

Section: A Basic Idea Of Overlaytfmrcmentioning

confidence: 99%

A scalable overlay multicast congestion control for multimedia streaming

Ruan

2005

The IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks 30th Anniversary (LCN'05)l

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a scalable overlay multicast congestion control scheme (OverlayTFMRC) for multimedia streaming over Internet. The scheme seeks to extend multicast scalability within our previous TCP-Friendly unicast congestion control scheme streamTFRC using multiple time-scale prediction for multimedia QoS transport. Besides efficient QoS transport support based on our previous work, Over-layTFMRC implements multicast scalability design into session rate control, feedback compression and data forward respectively by fully considering overlay network characteristics. Compared with TFMCC, simulation experiments illustrate that our scheme achieves not only better session scalability performance in terms of session throughput and its smoothness, but also better TCP-Friendly performance in terms of intra-protocol& inter-protocol fairness and smoothness.

show abstract

“…Ka-band is very desirable for multimedia communications because it offers wider bandwidth. Such large bandwidth segments are unavailable at lower frequencies, such as Kuband (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) GHz) and C-band (4-6 GHz), which were until recently the bands used for fixed satellite service (FSS) communications. Most very small aperture terminal (VSAT) and direct broadcast satellite television (DBS TV) systems in operation today use portions of the Ku-band, while most Ka-band systems are scheduled to start offering customer service in the near future [2,10].…”

Section: Constraints Imposed By the Channelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, long propagation delays make retransmission of data in response to user feedback inefficient, if not impossible. In a backbone deployment, existence of terrestrial links allows the use of supporting mechanisms such as feedback aggregation [14][15][16][17][18] and feedback suppression [17][18][19][20], which have been primarily developed with wireline terrestrial networks in mind. In a direct-to-home deployment, however, the applicability of these algorithms are limited as we will further elaborate in Section 3.3.…”

Section: Loss Detection and Feedbackmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transport protocols in multicast via satellite

Akkor

Hadjitheodosiou

Baras

2004

Satell Commun Network

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYIn a wide variety of broadband applications, there is a need to distribute information to a potentially large number of receiver sites that are widely dispersed from each other. Communication satellites are a natural technology option and are extremely well suited for carrying such services because of the inherent broadcast capability of the satellite channel. Despite the potential of satellite multicast, there exists little support for multicast services over satellite networks. Although several multicast protocols have been proposed for use over the Internet, they are not optimized for satellite networks. One of the key multicast components that is affected when satellite networks are involved in the communication is the transport layer. In this paper, we attempt to provide an overview of the design space and the ways in which the network deployment and application requirements affect the solution space for transport layer schemes in a satellite environment. We also highlight some of the issues that are critical in the development of next generation satellite multicast services.

show abstract

Scalable fair multicast using active services

Cited by 7 publications

References 15 publications

Delay-Constrained, Low-Cost Multicast Routing in Multimedia Networks

Delay-Constrained, Low-Cost Multicast Routing in Multimedia Networks

A scalable overlay multicast congestion control for multimedia streaming

Transport protocols in multicast via satellite

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About