2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2021.100685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable manufacturing of conductive rubber nanocomposites with ultralow percolation threshold for strain sensing applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Lv et al prepared a stretchable natural rubber/CNT-based nanocomposite that provides higher strain sensitivity with a gauge factor (GF) of 19.6 up to 150% strain. 13 Costa et al proposed a styrene butadiene styrene/CNT sensor that provides very high stretchability but low sensitivity. 14 It can be suggested that there is demand for developing a multifunctional sensor that demonstrates good flexibility without compromising sensitivity.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Lv et al prepared a stretchable natural rubber/CNT-based nanocomposite that provides higher strain sensitivity with a gauge factor (GF) of 19.6 up to 150% strain. 13 Costa et al proposed a styrene butadiene styrene/CNT sensor that provides very high stretchability but low sensitivity. 14 It can be suggested that there is demand for developing a multifunctional sensor that demonstrates good flexibility without compromising sensitivity.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, research has shifted toward elastomer-based nanocomposites to enhance electronics devices’ stretchability. For instance, Lv et al prepared a stretchable natural rubber/CNT-based nanocomposite that provides higher strain sensitivity with a gauge factor (GF) of 19.6 up to 150% strain . Costa et al proposed a styrene butadiene styrene/CNT sensor that provides very high stretchability but low sensitivity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the third one is the most significant method for fabricating flexible conductors. Also, for the second and third methods of preparing flexible conductors, to improve the binding force between substrates and fillers, some modifying agent is used to connect substrates and fillers or conductive polymers, such as silane coupling agents, PEDOT:PSS, and so on. , In most of the research studies, only room-temperature properties of the obtained flexible conductors were focused on. However, for the conventional polymer flexible substrates, freezing of molecular chain segments occurs at low temperatures and results in the reduction of toughness, leading to the failure of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of linear filler content, when it approaches the percolation threshold, the conductive network becomes unstable, and the strain sensor has weak resistance to external stimuli, showing a large change in electrical resistance and, hence, a high sensing sensitivity . In terms of linear filler dispersion, for example, CNTs tend to form aggregates due to large van der Waals forces (fillers tend to form aggregates, resulting in a slip between CNTs during the tensile strain process and, hence, the small resistance change), , which will lead to a higher filler addition, reduced flexibility, poor electrical conductivity, and decreased sensing sensitivity. , In terms of linear filler aspect ratio, due to the destruction of the aspect ratio during the process, it is kind of difficult to study the effect of aspect ratio on strain sensing behavior and the related literature is few in the field of strain sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, during the deformation process of a sensor, the distance between fibers changes from within the electron tunneling distance to beyond the electron tunneling distance through structural design, which would effectively improve sensor sensitivity. The structural design in references is all related with the conductive nanofiber dispersive status: (1) better dispersion (less aggregation) to enable a percolation threshold at a lower conductive nanofiber content; ,,, (2) oriented dispersion in a one-dimensional (1D) or two-dimensional (2D) geometrical substance to enhance the distance change between conductive nanofibers, which covers the distance range from within the electron tunneling distance to beyond the electron tunneling distance. In terms of well-dispersive structural design, a large amount of chemical solvent is required and causes a harmful impact on the environment; in terms of oriented dispersive structural design, the substance is limited to fibers (1D) or films (2D) but cannot be applied to a three-dimensional (3D) substance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%