2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3231812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable Modeling of Human Blockage at Millimeter-Wave: A Comparative Analysis of Knife-Edge Diffraction, the Uniform Theory of Diffraction, and Physical Optics Against 60 GHz Channel Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As they predict on a given shape for the body, they are inherently generalizable across a range of body dimensions; and as the shape can evolve over time in dynamic scenarios, they are inherently temporally consistent, which is critical for sensing. In [9], [10], three such models -the triple knifeedge diffraction (TKED), the uniform theory of diffraction (UTD), and physical optics (PO) -are compared in Table 1 (taken from [9]) in terms of runtime, accuracy, and applicability. In particular, the PO model -the most complex of the three -when applied to the so-called "phantom" shape representing the full contour of the body as an infinite number of scatter centers does result in high-fidelity realizations, but is too computationally expensive to simulate large networks with numerous targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As they predict on a given shape for the body, they are inherently generalizable across a range of body dimensions; and as the shape can evolve over time in dynamic scenarios, they are inherently temporally consistent, which is critical for sensing. In [9], [10], three such models -the triple knifeedge diffraction (TKED), the uniform theory of diffraction (UTD), and physical optics (PO) -are compared in Table 1 (taken from [9]) in terms of runtime, accuracy, and applicability. In particular, the PO model -the most complex of the three -when applied to the so-called "phantom" shape representing the full contour of the body as an infinite number of scatter centers does result in high-fidelity realizations, but is too computationally expensive to simulate large networks with numerous targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the combination of the knifeedge diffraction-based (KED) method [14] with a vertical screen, the combination of the uniform theory of diffraction (UTD) method for wedge diffraction [15] with a prism-like model, and the combination of the UTD method for creeping diffraction [7], [16] with a circular or elliptic cylinder have been proposed. In previous research, the human body was modeled as a screen in [17], [18], a prism-like cylinder in [19], [20], and the circular and elliptic cylinders in [16]. All the conventional geometric human models were defined from the dimensions measured in advance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the PO calculation, the field scattered from RIS can be easily calculated by the integral of the approximated surface current weighted by the phase shift of RIS [24]. Unfortunately, the traditional PO expressed by numerical integration is impractical, since it requires a large computational load, compared to the analytical approach [27]. Thus, the paper [24] involved the Fraunhofer and Fresnel approximations (see Appendix A) in the PO calculation to obtain analytical solutions, resulting in a lower computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%